Global endothelial function assessment using pulse wave analysis in hypercholesterolemia

Autores

  • Nik Nor Izah Nik Ibrahim Department of Pharmacology, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan 16150, Malaysia; Hospital USM, Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Malaysia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9817-1574
  • Razlina Abdul Rahman Department of Family Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan 16150, Malaysia; Hospital USM, Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Malaysia
  • Maryam Azlan School of Health Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan 16150, Malaysia
  • Aida Hanum Rasool Department of Pharmacology, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan 16150, Malaysia; Hospital USM, Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/s2175-97902022e191010%20

Palavras-chave:

Endothelial function, Endothelium dependent vasodilatation, Endothelium independent vasodilatation, Augmentation index, SphygmoCor

Resumo

To compare global endothelial function assessed by pulse wave analysis (PWA) using the ratio of endothelium dependent vasodilatation (EDV) to endothelium independent vasodilatation (EIV) in patients with hypercholesterolemia and controls. 92 subjects [46 hypercholesterolemics, 46 controls] were studied at standardized conditions. Baseline augmentation index (AIx) was assessed followed by the administration of 0.5 mg sublingual nitroglycerine, an endothelium independent vasodilator. AIx was assessed and the maximum change in AIx after nitroglycerine was recorded as EIV. After a washout period of 30 minutes, 400 µg of inhaled salbutamol, an endothelium dependent vasodilator was administered. AIx was assessed again and the maximum change in AIx after salbutamol was recorded as EDV. Global endothelial function was calculated as EDV:EIV ratio. EDV and EIV in patients with hypercholesterolemia compared to controls were 2.97 ± 3.95 and 6.65 ± 3.80 (p<0.001); and 13.41 ± 4.57 and 15.88 ± 4.78 (p=0.01) respectively. EDV:EIV ratio was significantly reduced in patients with hypercholesterolemia compared to controls; 0.21 ± 0.38 and 0.44 ± 0.24 (p<0.001) respectively. EDV:EIV ratio was significantly reduced in patients with hypercholesterolemia compared to controls. PWA is a potential clinical tool to assess global endothelial function in patients with hypercholesterolemia.

Downloads

Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.

Referências

Covic A., Goldsmith DJ, Gusbeth-Tatomir P, Covic M. Haemodialysis acutely improves endothelium-independent vasomotor function without significantly influencing the endothelium-mediated abnormal response to a beta 2-agonist. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2004;19(3):637-643.

Endemann DH, Schiffrin EL, Endothelial dysfunction. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004;15(8):1983-1992.

Hayward CS, Kraidly M, Webb CM, Collins P. Assessment of endothelial function using peripheral waveform analysis: a clinical application. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;40(3):521-528.

Ibrahim NN, Rasool AH, Wong AR, Rahman AR. Prevalence of beta-2 adrenergic receptor (beta 2 AR) polymorphisms and its influence on a model used to assess endothelial function using pulse wave analysis (PWA). Clin Chim Acta. 2009;409(1-2):62-66.

Ikdahl E, Hisdal J, Rollefstad S, Olsen IC, Kvien TK, Pedersen TR, et al. Rosuvastatin improves endothelial function in patients with inflammatory joint diseases, longitudinal associations with atherosclerosis and arteriosclerosis: results from the RORA-AS statin intervention study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2015;17:279.

Incalza MA , D’Oria R, Natalicchio A, Perrini S, Laviola L, Giorgino F. Oxidative stress and reactive oxygen species in endothelial dysfunction associated with cardiovascular and metabolic diseases. Vascul Pharmacol. 2018;100:1-19.

Lekakis J, Abraham P, Balbarini A, Blann A, Boulanger CM, Cockcroft J, et al. Methods for evaluating endothelial function: a position statement from the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Peripheral Circulation. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2011;18(6):775-789.

Maruhashi T, Soga J, Fujimura N, Idei N, Mikami S, Iwamoto Y, et al. Nitroglycerine-induced vasodilation for assessment of vascular function: a comparison with flow-mediated vasodilation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2013;33(6):1401-1408.

McEniery CM. How to measure endothelial function by pulse wave analysis. Artery Res. 2007;1(2):39.

McEniery CM, Wallace S, Mackenzie IS, McDonnell B, Yasmin, Newby DE, et al. Endothelial function is associated with pulse pressure, pulse wave velocity, and augmentation index in healthy humans. Hypertension. 2006;48(4):602-608.

Paul B, Hewitson CL, Woodman RJ, Mangoni AA. Analysis of short-term reproducibility of arterial vasoreactivity by pulse-wave analysis after pharmacological challenge. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2009;36(1):49-54.

Raitakari OT, Seale JP, Celermajer DS. Impaired vascular responses to nitroglycerin in subjects with coronary atherosclerosis. Am J Cardiol. 2001;87(2):217-219.

Schachinger V, Britten MB, Zeiher AM. Prognostic impact of coronary vasodilator dysfunction on adverse long-term outcome of coronary heart disease. Circulation. 2000;101(16):1899-906.

Stapleton PA, Goodwill AG, James ME, Brock RW, Frisbee JC. Hypercholesterolemia and microvascular dysfunction: interventional strategies. J Inflamm (Lond). 2010;7:54.

Storch AS, Mattos JD, Alves R, Galdino S, Roca HNM. Methods of Endothelial Function Assessment: Description and Applications. Int J Cardiovasc Sci. 2017;30(3):262-273.

Wilkinson IB, Hall IR, MacCallum H, Mackenzie IS, McEniery CM, van der Arend BJ, et al. Pulse-wave analysis: clinical evaluation of a noninvasive, widely applicable method for assessing endothelial function. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol . 2002;22(1):147-152.

Downloads

Publicado

2022-11-23

Edição

Seção

Original Article

Como Citar

Global endothelial function assessment using pulse wave analysis in hypercholesterolemia. (2022). Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 58. https://doi.org/10.1590/s2175-97902022e191010

Dados de financiamento