Development after divorce as a strategy of human growth

Authors

  • Diogo Jorge Pereira do Vale Lamela Universidade do Minho; Departamento de Psicologia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.19908

Keywords:

adult, divorce, development, developmental pathways

Abstract

Divorce is one of the most stressful moments in adults' lives. After the marital dissolution, ex-partners have to face many changes and challenges. The psychological literature has given priority to the study of the negative consequences of divorce in the developmental pathways of all members of the family, through exhaustive research of adjustment problems that would prove that divorce is itself a factor of emotional destabilization and risk for psychological disorder. However, currently, there are lines of research that are distant from this view, focusing on the possibilities of positive development that can germinate with a divorce. Thus, divorce adjustment is not seen as a process of cumulative losses but, rather, as a potential qualitative process characterized by new life goals, skills improvement, and bigger intimate and emotional maturity. This article proposes a conceptualization of divorce adjustment as being measured by the qualitative result of a sequence of integrated developmental changes, where more advanced levels of development, which somehow are also more differentiated, must integrate and overcome the previous and instrumental levels in divorce adjustment. Finally, the theoretical difficulties existing in the literature to define positive development are introduced, as well the methodological procedures used to understand these pathways of human growth.

References

Hetherington EM, Kelly J. For better or for the worse: divorce reconsidered. New York: Norton; 2002.

Ahrons C, Rodgers R. Divorced families: a multidisciplinary developmental view. New York: Norton; 1987.

Bergler E. Divorce won’t help. New York: Hart Publishing Company; 1948.

Bailey J, Robbins S. Couple empowerment in divorce: a comparison of mediated and no mediated outcomes. Conflict Resolution Quartely. 2005;22(4): 453-472.

Kaslow F, Hyatt R. Divorce: a potential growth experience for the extended family. J Divorce. 1982; 6: 115-125.

Pals J. Narrative identity processing of difficult life experiences: pathways of personality development and positive self-transformation in adulthood. J Personality. 2006; 74(4): 1079-1109.

Amato P. The consequences of divorce for adults and children. J Marriage and Family. 2000; 62: 1269-1287.

Hetherington E. An overview of the Virginia Longitudinal Study of divorce and remarriage with a focus on early adolescence. J Family Psychology. 1993; 7: 39-56.

Pledge D. Marital separation/divorce: a review of individual responses to a major life stressor. J Divorce Remarriage. 1992; 17(3/4): 151-181.

Simon R, Marcussen K. Maritaltransitions, marital beliefs, and mental health. J Health Social Behavior. 1999; 40: 111-125.

Doherty W, Su S, Needle R. Marital disruption and psychological well-being. J Family Issues. 1989; 10(1): 72-85.

Swepper S. Adult adjustment to relationship separation [Dissertação].Griffith: Griffith University; 2004.

Shapiro A. Explaining psychological distress in a sample of remarried and divorced persons. J Family Issues. 1996; 17: 186-203.

Verbrugge L. Marital status and health. J Marriage and the Family.1979; 49: 267-285.

Cantor C, Sltator P. Marital break down, parenthood, and suicide. J Family Studies. 1995; 1: 91-102.

Milardo RM. Comparative methods for delineating social networks. J Social and personal Relationships. 1992;9: 447-461.

Sayer LC. Economic aspects of divorce and relationship dissolution. In: Fine M, Harvey J, organizadores. Handbook of Divorce and Relationship Dissolution. Hahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2006. p.385-406.

Uunk W. The economic consequences of divorce for women in the European Union: the impact of welfare state arrangements. Eur J Population. 2004; 20: 251-285.

Booth A, Amato P. Divorce and psychological stress. J Health Social Behaviour. 1991; 32:396:407.

Kiecolt-Glaser J, et al. Marital discord and immunity in males. Psychosomatic Medicine 1988; 50: 213-229.

Baum N, Rahav G, Sharon D. Changes in the self-concepts of divorced women. J Divorce Remarriage. 2005; 43(1/2): 47-67.

Birnbaum G, et al. When marriage breaks up – does attachment style contribute to coping and mental health. J Social Personal Relationships. 1997; 14: 643-654.

Gardner J, Oswald A. Do divorcing couples become happier by breaking up? J Royal Statistical Society: Series A 2006; 169(2): 319-336.

Holmes T, Rahe R. The social readjustment rating scale. J Psychosomatic Research. 1967; 4: 189-194.

Counts R, Sacks A. The need for crisis intervention during marital separation.1985; 30(2): 146-150.

Tashiro T, Frazier P, Berman M. Stress-related growth following divorce and relationship dissolution. In: Fine M, Harvey J, organizadores. Handbook of Divorce and Relationship Dissolution. Hahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2006. p.361-384.

Hetherington EM. Intimate pathways: changing patterns in close personal relationships across time. Family Relations. 2003; 52(4): 318-331.

Clarke-Stewart A, Brentano C. Divorce: causes and consequences. 1.ed. New Haven: Yale University Press; 2006.

O’Leary M, et al. Divorcing parents: factors related to coping and adjustment. J Divorce and Remarriage. 1996; 25: 85-103.

Hilton J, Desrochers S. The influence of economic strain, coping with roles, and parental control on the parenting of custodial single mothers and custo dial single fathers. J Divorce Remarriage. 2000; 33(3/4): 55-76.

Madden-Derdich D, Leonard S,Christopher F. Boundary ambiguity and Copa rental conflict after divorce: an empirical of a family systems model of the divorce process. J Marriageand Family. 1999; 61(3): 588-598.

Graff-Reed R. Positive effects of stressful events: psychological growth following divorce [dissertação]. Miami: Miami University; 2004.

Masten A. Ordinary magic: resilience processes in development. American Psychologist. 2001; 56(3): 227-238.

Lerner R, Dowling E, Chaudhuri J. Methods of contextual assessment and assessing contextual methods: a developmental systems perspective. InTeti D, organizador. Handbook of Research Methods in Developmental Science; 2004. p. 183-209.

Rollie S, Duck S. Divorce and dissolution of romantic relationships: stage models and their limitations. In: Fine M, Harvey J, organizadores. Handbook of Divorce and Relationship Dissolution. Hahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2006. p. 223-240.

Instituto Nacional de Estatística. Anuário estatístico de Portugal 2006. Lisboa: Instituto Nacional de Estatística; 2007.

Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Estatísticas do registro civil 2006. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística; 2007.

Ressler R, Waters, M. Female earnings and the divorce rate: a simultaneous equations model. Applied Economics.2000; 32(14): 1889-1898.

Allen D. No-fault divorce in Canada: itscause and effect. J Economic Behavior Organization. 1998; 37:129-149.

Rasul I. The impact of divorce laws on marriage [manuscrito não publicado].Londres: University College; 2006.

Mechoulan S. Divorce laws and the structure of the American family. The Journal of Legal Studies. 2006; 35: 143-174.

Downloads

Published

2009-04-01

Issue

Vol. 19 No. 1 (2009)

Section

Review Article

License

CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL  PUBLISHERS

 

Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:

 

Publishers should:

 

  • Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
  • Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
  • Protect intellectual property and copyright
  • Foster editorial independence

 

Publishers should work with journal editors to:

 

  • Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:

–         Editorial  independence

–         Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research

–         Authorship

–         Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards

–         Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor

–         Appeals and complaints

  • Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
  • Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
  • Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
  • Maintain the integrity of the academic record
  • Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
  • Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
  • Publish content on a timely basis