Atribuição de nomes próprios e seu papel no desenvolvimento segundo o relato dos nomeados
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.37705Palavras-chave:
nomes próprios, nomeação.Resumo
O presente estudo replica e amplia a pesquisa anteriormente realizada por Rabinovich et al (191), sobre o processo de nomeação de crianças tendo como base agora a fala de sujeitos adultos sobre o próprio nome. As categorias ptopostas foram validadas e ampliadas. Concluiu-se que o nome, enquanto “script” outorgado pelos pais, indica, entre outros fatores, o futuro papel do nomeado no seu contexto familiar e social, sendo essa influência, em grande parte, desconhecida do nomeado.Referências
Abraham K. Sobre el poder determinante de los nombres. In: Estudios sobre Psicanálise y Psiquiatria. Ed. Horme, Buenos Aires. 1961.p. 29-30.
Aspey WP. Wolf Spider Sociobiology: Agonistic Display and Dominance Sub ordinance Relalions in Adult Male. Scbizocosa Crassipes. Behavior. LXII: 103-141, 1977.
AndersonT, Schmitt PR. Unique First Names in Male and Female Psychiatric Patients. Journal of Social Psychology. 130(6): 835-837, 1989.
Berenstein L. Família e doença mental. Editora Escuta, São Paulo, 1988.
Chevalier J, Gheerbrant A. Dicionário de Símbolos. 4ª edição, José Olímpio Editora, Rio de Janeiro, 1991.
Eagleson OW. Students’s reactions to their given-names. Journal of Social Psychology,223: 187-195, 1946.
Hartman AA, Nicolay RC, Huri EYJ. Unique Personal Names as a social adjustment factor. Journal of Social Psychology, 76:107-110, 1968.
Koskas A. Un prénom et un nom pour écrireun corps. 1985. [Comunicado particular].
Marcus MG. The Power of a Name. Psychology Today. October 1976, p. 75-76.
Martins F. O nome próprio. Univcrsidade de Brasília, Brasília, 1991.
Rabinovich EP et al. Atribuição dos nomes próprios de neonatos. Boletim de Psicologia XLI (94/95), Jan - Dez/ 1991.
Savage BM, Wells FLA. Note on Singularity on Given Names. Journal of Social Psychology, 27: 271-272, 1948.
Schomberg BM, Murphy DM. The Relantionship Between the Uniqueness of Given Name and Personality. Journal of Social Psychology, 93:147, 1974.
Zweigenhaft RL, Hayes KN, Haagen CH. The Psychological Impact of Names. Journal of Social Psychology. 110:203-210, 1980.
Volpi AJ. Edipo, psicodrama do deslino. Agora. São Paulo, 1990.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL PUBLISHERS
Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:
- Follow this code, and encourage the editors they work with to follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Edi- tors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf)
- Ensure the editors and journals they work with are aware of what their membership of COPE provides and en- tails
- Provide reasonable practical support to editors so that they can follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf_)
Publishers should:
- Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
- Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
- Protect intellectual property and copyright
- Foster editorial independence
Publishers should work with journal editors to:
- Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:
– Editorial independence
– Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research
– Authorship
– Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards
– Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor
– Appeals and complaints
- Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
- Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
- Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
- Maintain the integrity of the academic record
- Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
- Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
- Publish content on a timely basis