MEANINGS ATTRIBUTED TO EVERYDAY LIFE BY THE POOR ADOLESCENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.39671Keywords:
adolescence, poor adolescent, everyday life, ways of life, meanings.Abstract
Adolescence has been described and explained from two points of view: lhe nonhistorical and the culturally situated ones. The present study was guided by lhe cultural standpoint, which admits lhe existence of “adolescentes”. Intending to describe ways of life, meanings attributed to everyday events and life projects of nine poor adolescents, information was collected through interviews. The analysis and interpretation of the obtained reports indicated that the adolescents live with their families in violent neighborhoods; they experience domesticviolence and affective loneliness; they do housework, independent of gender; they view the school as a place for playing and building friendships; they reject conducts that disqualify the other; they have life projects concerned with their career and family constitution. Some of them expressed peculiarities such as fear, insecurity and concern about the future, originated from the violence situations to which they were subjected, or that were observed by them. Differently
from the upper-classes adolescents, they are not submitted yet to consumerist appeals.
References
Andrade AN. O acolhimento à processualidade: entre a multiplicidade da Psicologia e a multiplicidade do psicológico. In: Souza L, Freitas MFQ, Rodrigues MMR.(Org.). Psicologia reflexões (im)pertinentes. São Paulo: Casa do Psicólogo, 1998. p. 109-128.
Andrade NA, Novo HA. “Eles ficam, nós namoramos”: algumas reflexões sobre a adolescência. In: Novo HÁ, Menandro MCS. Olhares diversos estudando o desenvolvimento humano. Vitória: Gráfica Santo Antônio, 2000. p.91 -106.
Araújo MAL. Educação e identidade cultural. Rev FAEEBA. Salvador: 1996;(6): 105-118.
Bruner J. Atos de significação. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas, 1997.
Burman E. Developmental psychology and its discontents. In: Fox D, Prilleltensky L. (Org.). Critical psychology - an introduction.London: Sage, 1997. p. 134-149.
Castro LR. O lugar da infância na modernidade. Psicologia: Reflexão e Critica, Porto Alegre: 1996;9(2):307-335.
Costa M, López E. Salud comunitária. Barcelona: Martins Roca, 1986.
Demo R. Introdução à metodologia da ciência. São Paulo: Atlas, 1985.
Demo P. Metodologia do conhecimento científico. São Paulo: Atlas, 2000.
Gil AC. Métodos e técnicas de pesquisa social. São Paulo: Atlas, 1987.
González Rey E. La investigación cualitativa en Psicologia – rumo bosy desafios. São Paulo: EDUC, 1999.
Lax WD. O pensamento pós-moderno na prática clínica. In: McNamee S, Gergen KJ. A terapia como construção social. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas, 1998. p.86-105.
Misra G, Gergen KJ. On lhe place of culture in psychological science. International Journal of Psychology. 1993; 28(2):225-243.
Mussen RH, Conger JJ, Kagan J. Desenvolvimento e personalidade da criança. São Paulo: Harper & Row do Brasil, 1977.
Nascimento AB. Quem tem medo da geração shopping? Salvador: EDUFBA, 1999a.
Nascimento AB. Trajetória da juventude brasileira - dos anos 30 ao final do século. Salvador: EDUFBA, 1999b.
Pfromm Neto S. Psicologia da adolescência. São Paulo: Livraria Pioneira Editora,1971.
Salles LMF. Adolescência, escola e cotidiano: contradições entre o genérico e o particular. Piracicaba: Editora Unimep,1998.
Tripoli SG. A arte de viver do adolescente – a travessia entre a criança e o adulto. São Paulo: Arte e Ciência, 1998.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL PUBLISHERS
Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:
- Follow this code, and encourage the editors they work with to follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Edi- tors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf)
- Ensure the editors and journals they work with are aware of what their membership of COPE provides and en- tails
- Provide reasonable practical support to editors so that they can follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf_)
Publishers should:
- Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
- Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
- Protect intellectual property and copyright
- Foster editorial independence
Publishers should work with journal editors to:
- Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:
– Editorial independence
– Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research
– Authorship
– Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards
– Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor
– Appeals and complaints
- Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
- Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
- Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
- Maintain the integrity of the academic record
- Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
- Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
- Publish content on a timely basis
