Challenges of complementary and alternative medicine in the SUS aiming to health promotion
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.44936Keywords:
complementary and alternative medicine, public health promotionAbstract
The complementary and alternative medicines (CAM) besides promoting the reduction of costs, have also proven to be effective as well as they have invested in health promotion and health education, as a means of preventing the disease to take control and possibly result in serious consequences. OBJECTIVE: to investigate the knowledge, opinions and social representations of managers and health professionals about those practices (CAM) in Public Health System (SUS) as well as to identify the difficulties and challenges that are present in their implementation, use and disclosure in the Health Services. METHODS: the survey was carried out in a Basic Health Unit and Specialty Clinic in the northern area of São Paulo/SP, Brazil. We chose the qualitative approach with its instruments, documentary analysis and interviews based upon pre-established guidelines directed to managers and health professionals of these units. The total of 35 interviews took place between the months of July to August 2010. RESULTS: the results support the thesis that managers are not prepared to implement the National Policy on Complementary and Integrative Practices (NPCIP) inSUS: only five out of the twenty six respondents were aware of the National Policy (NPCIP); the biomedical model sessions still prevails; material supply and acquisition of raw materials used in some of the CAM have become a major issue in the unit; the disclosure of the CAM has not been enough so as to be fully known by professionals and users alike. Furthermore, most of the professionals working in the Specialty Clinic where the CAM has been offered have undervalued those activities. The Complementary and Alternative Medicine have not played the role they should and/or could in the SUS for the Promotion of Health yet. CONCLUSIONS: it is pivotally necessary that the City of São Paulo/SP encourages and creates conditions for taking the CAM into all Health Units, so as to improve, disclose and support the inclusion of non-medical professionals, provided that they have proper training since practices such as Homeopathy, Acupuncture, Anthroposophy and Phytotherapy are already considered as medical specialties. Included in Public Health System (SUS),the Complementary and Alternative Medicine can certainly contribute a lot for the Promotion of Health.References
Conferência Nacional de Saúde (CNS),10.,1996, Brasília, DF. Relatório final. Brasília, DF: Ministério da Saúde, 1996.
Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde. Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde: política nacional de promoção da saúde. Brasília, DF; 2006.
Sícoli JL, Nascimento PR. Promoção da Saúde: conceitos, princípios e práticas. Interface -Comunic, Saúde, Educ 2003; 7(12):91-112.
Pelicioni MCF. Promoção da saúde e meio ambiente: uma trajetória técnico-política. In: Philippi A Jr, Pelicioni MCF. (Ed). Educação ambiental e sustentabilidade. Barueri: Manole, 2005.
Souza EFAA de, Luz MT. Bases socioculturais das práticas terapêuticas alternativas. História, Ciências, Saúde – Manguinhos, Rio de Janeiro 2009;16(2):393-405.
Rosen G. Uma história da saúde pública. São Paulo/Rio de Janeiro: co:edição Hucitec/Unesp/Abrasco; 1994.
Capra F. O ponto de mutação: a ciência, a sociedade e a cultura emergente. 26ª ed. São Paulo: Cultrix; 2006. p.116-155.
Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde. Relatório de gestão 2009. Brasília,DF, 2010. 501 p. [acesso em 12 jul 2011]. Disponível em: http:// portal.saude.gov.br/portal/arquivos/ pdf/relatorio_gestao_sas_2009.pdf
Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde. Departamento de Atenção Básica. Política Nacional de Práticas Integrativas e Complementares no SUS - PNPICSUS /Ministério da Saúde, Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde, Departamento de Atenção Básica. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde, 2006. 92 p. (Série B. Textos Básicos de Saúde).
Minayo MCS. O desafio do conhecimento: pesquisa qualitativa em saúde. São Paulo: HUCITEC/ABRASCO; 2004. p.54-76.
Gil AC. Métodos e Técnicas de Pesquisa Social. São Paulo: Atlas; 2008. p.42-45.
Nunes ED. A metodologia qualitativa em saúde. Dilemas e desafios. In: Barros NF; Cecatti JG; Turato ER (org.). Pesquisa qualitativa em saúde: múltiplos olhares. Campinas: Universidade Estadual de Campinas; 2005; p.15-24.
Gil AC. Métodos e Técnicas de Pesquisa em Educação Ambiental. In: Philippi Jr. A, Pelicioni MCF. eds. Educação ambiental e sustentabilidade. Barueri: Manole; 2005; p. 577-598.
Lüdke M, André MEDA. Pesquisa em educação: abordagens qualitativas. São Paulo: EPU;1986. p.34.
Teixeira E. Reflexões sobre o paradigma holístico e holismo e saúde. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP 1996; 30(2):286-90.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL PUBLISHERS
Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:
- Follow this code, and encourage the editors they work with to follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Edi- tors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf)
- Ensure the editors and journals they work with are aware of what their membership of COPE provides and en- tails
- Provide reasonable practical support to editors so that they can follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf_)
Publishers should:
- Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
- Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
- Protect intellectual property and copyright
- Foster editorial independence
Publishers should work with journal editors to:
- Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:
– Editorial independence
– Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research
– Authorship
– Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards
– Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor
– Appeals and complaints
- Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
- Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
- Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
- Maintain the integrity of the academic record
- Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
- Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
- Publish content on a timely basis