Motor development of brazilian breastfeeding infants in socially unfavorable condition of life

Autores/as

  • Eduardo Queiroz de Mello University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Sophia Motta Gallo University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Flavia Cristina Goulart University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Dafne Herrero University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Paulo Rogerio Gallo University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.81018

Palabras clave:

neurosensory motor development, breastfeeding infants, assessment tools, AIMS, social vulnerability

Resumen

The early years of life are of essential importance for child development and growth. The child’s development in a social vulnerability and unfavorable life condition can be injured, and that early detection of disorders is fundamental for healthy development. Purpose: To assessment the Alberta Infant Motor Scale as an assessment tool to identify early of disorders in infants until 18 months. Methods: This is an observational, cross-sectional study undertaken in “educational program for the growth and development promotion” at the health unit administered by reference hospital of Health Public System, in Paraisópolis community, São Paulo. The sample (n=71) was composed for infants less than 18 months of age, eutrophic, low biological risk at birth; singleton, full-term births, weight at birth between 2,000g e” and d” 4,500g and no associated congenital neurological, cardiac or orthopedic pathologies at the clinical exam. Results: This study presented the greatest prevalence of delay motor neuromotor when compared with the AIMS reference population. First, 8.5% of the breastfeeding infants are classified as being mdA and 7.0% are classified as dmS and secondly that, although the category mdT contains 84.5% of the children, the median of the z-score has shifted from the central point of the normal standardized distribution, only 33.7% of the children, i.e., 24 in 71, being equal to or above Z=0 (p<0.05). Conclusion: The use of AIMS was efficient, practice, low cost and quick applies. Plus a quick view of motor milestone presents by infant. Features that became possible take decision by health team.

Biografía del autor/a

  • Eduardo Queiroz de Mello, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
    Department of Maternal and Child Health, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Sophia Motta Gallo, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
    Department of Maternal and Child Health, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Flavia Cristina Goulart, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
    Department of Maternal and Child Health, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Dafne Herrero, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
    Department of Maternal and Child Health, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Paulo Rogerio Gallo, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
    Department of Maternal and Child Health, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Referencias

Herrero D, Goncalves H, Abreu LC. Escalas de desenvolvimento motor em lactentes. Rev Bras Crescimento Desenvolvimento Hum. 2011; 21(1): 122-132.

Venturella C.B., Zanandrea G., Saccani R., Valentini N.C.. Desenvolvimento motor de crianças entre 0 e 18 meses de idade: Diferenças entre os sexos. Motri. 2013; 9(2):3-12. DOI: 10.6063/motricidade.9(2).617.

Spann MN, Bansal R, Rosen TS, Peterson BS. Morphological features of the neonatal brain support development of subsequent cognitive, language, and motor abilities. Hum Brain Mapp. 2014 Feb 25. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.22487.

Herrero D, Gallo PR, Fujimori M, de Mello Monteiro CB, Valenti VE, Tavares CM, Gallo SM, Macedo CC, Oliveira AG, de Abreu LC1. Motor development of infants exposed to maternal human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) but not infected. Int Arch Med. 2013 Oct 31;6(1):45. DOI: 10.1186/1755-7682-6-45.

Silva LP, Maia PC, Lopes MM, Cardoso MV. Intraclass reliability of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale in the Brazilian version. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2013 Oct 47(5):1046-51. DOI: 10.1590/S0080-623420130000500006.

Darrah J, Bartlett D, Maguire TO, Avison WR, Lacaze-Masmonteil T. Have infant gross motor abilities changed in 20 years? A reevaluation of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale normative values. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2014 Mar 29. DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.12452.

Rocha SR, Dornelasb LF, Magalhães LC. Instrumentos utilizados para avaliação do desenvolvimento de recém-nascidos prétermo no Brasil: revisão da literature. Cad. Ter. Ocup. UFSCar. 2013; 21(1):109-117. DOI: 10.4322/cto.2013.015

Piper MC, Pinnel LE, Darrah J, Maguire T, Byrne PJ. Construction and validation of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS). Can J Public Health. 1992; 83 Suppl 2: S46-50.

Darrah J, Bartlett DJ. Infant rolling abilities—the same or different 20 years after the back to sleep campaign? Early Hum Dev. 2013 May 89(5):311-4. DOI: 10.1016/j. earlhumdev.2012. 10.009.

Van Hus JW, Jeukens-Visser M, Koldewijn K, Van Sonderen L, Kok JH, Nollet F, Van Wassenaer-Leemhuis AG. Comparing two motor assessment tools to evaluate neurobehavioral intervention effects in infants with very low birth weight at 1 year. Phys Ther. 2013 Nov 93(11):1475-83. DOI:10.2522/ptj. 20120460.

Gontijo AP, de Castro Magalhães L, Guerra MQ. Assessing gross motor development of Brazilian infants. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2014 Spring 26(1):48-55. DOI: 10.1097/PEP.0000000000000014.

Fleuren KMW, Smit LS, Stijnen T, Hartman A. New reference values for the Alberta Infant Motor Scale need to be established. Acta Pædiatr. 2007; 96(3):424-427. DOI:10.1111/j.1651-2227.2007.00111.x

Halpern R, Giugliane ERJ, Victora CG, Barros FC, Horta BL. Fatores de risco para suspeita de atraso no desenvolvimento neuropsicomotor aos 12 meses de vida. J Pediatr. 2000; 76(6):421-428. DOI: 0021-7557/00/76-06/421. 76(6).

Halpern R, Barros AJD, Matijasevich A, Santos IS, Victoria CG, Barros FC. Developmental status at age 12 months according to birth weight and Family income: a comparison of two Brazilian birth cohorts. Cad Saude Publica. 2008; 24 Suppl 3: S444-450. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1590/S0102-311X2008001500010

Campos D, Santos DCC, Gonçalves VMG, Goto MMF, Arias AV, Brianeze ACGS, Campos TM, Mello BBA. Concordância entre escalas de triagem e diagnóstico do desenvolvimento motor no sexto mês de vida. J Pediatr. 2006; 82:470-474. DOI: 10.2223/JPED.1567

Who Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group. Assessment of sex differences and heterogeneity in motor milestone attainment among populations in the WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study. Acta Pædiatr.2006; Suppl 450:66-75. DOI: 10.1080/08035320500495530

Blanchard Y, Neilan E, Busanich J, Garavuso L, Klimas D. Interrater reliability of early intervention providers scoring the Alberta Infant Motor Scale. Pediat Phys Ther. 2004;16:13-18.

Lopes VB, Lima CD, Tudella E. Neuromotor acquisition rate in Brazilian infants. Inf Child Dev. 2009; 18: 122-132. DOI: 10.1002/icd.595

Saccani R, Valentini NC. Analysis of motor development of infants from zero to 18 months of age: representativeness of the motors items of the alberta infant motor scale by age and posture. Journal of Human Growth and Development. 2010; 20(3).

Frônio JS, Coelho AR, Graças LA, Ribeiro LC. Nutritional status and gross motor development of infants between six and eighteen months of age. Journal of Human Growth and Development. 2011; 21(1).

Rodrigues OMPR, Bolsoni-Silva AT. Effects of the prematurity on the development of infants. Journal of Human Growth and Development. 2011; 21 (1).

Descargas

Publicado

2014-06-01

Número

Vol. 24 Núm. 2 (2014)

Sección

Artigos Originais

Licencia

CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL  PUBLISHERS

 

Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:

 

Publishers should:

 

  • Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
  • Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
  • Protect intellectual property and copyright
  • Foster editorial independence

 

Publishers should work with journal editors to:

 

  • Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:

–         Editorial  independence

–         Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research

–         Authorship

–         Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards

–         Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor

–         Appeals and complaints

  • Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
  • Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
  • Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
  • Maintain the integrity of the academic record
  • Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
  • Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
  • Publish content on a timely basis