Scientific Thought as a Planetary Phenomenon

Authors

  • Gildo Magalhães Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas da Universidade de São Paulo
  • Ana Torrejais Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas da Universidade de São Paulo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/khronos.v0i4.128883

Keywords:

History of Sciences, History of Techniques, History of Medicine and Health, Historiography, Historical Epistemology

Abstract

The following text is the first chapter of "Scientific Thought as a Planetary Phenomenon," which was to be the most complete presentation of the noosphere theory, and which began to be written by Vernadsky between 1937 and 1938, but was repeatedly reworked during the terrible years of World War II. It may be noted that several passages are still sketches that ought to be deepened, but there was no time. It was only published in full in Russian in 1991 and the translation was made from the English edition by the Vernadsky Foundation in 1997

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2017-09-11

Issue

No. 4 (2017)

Section

Tradução

License

Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License in the "Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International" (CC BY-NC 4.0) modality that allows sharing of the work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
  2. Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publishing in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (eg in institutional repositories or on their personal page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate productive changes, as well as increase impact and citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  4. Any doubts or complaints about copyright must be directed to the Editorial Board or qualify and express themselves in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publications Ethics (COPE).

 

How to Cite

Magalhães, G., & Torrejais, A. (2017). Scientific Thought as a Planetary Phenomenon. Khronos, 4, 153-166. https://doi.org/10.11606/khronos.v0i4.128883