COVID-19 pandemic: stress level and quality of life in contaminated and non-contaminated cases

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1679-9836.v101i6e-199108

Keywords:

Perceived Stress, Quality of Life, Coronavirus, COVID-19

Abstract

Introduction: The coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) has not only impacted physical health, as result of the severe acute respiratory syndrome caused by the virus, but has also impacted mental health, the economic and social areas. In addition, the focus of pandemic scenario was the COVID-19 contingency, which led to the appearance or worsening of other diseases. Besides the scopes originated from the pandemic became potential triggers of stress and interference in the population’s quality of life. Proposition: to evaluate the perceived stress index and the population’s quality of life in two groups of people: first, those who had a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 and, second, individuals who did not contract the disease. Materials and Methods: 66 individuals participated in the research, between 18 and 60 years old, being 33 people without contamination and 33 people who had a confirmed diagnosis. Participants answered two questionnaires: The Perceived Stress Questionnaire (QEP) to assess stress and another questionnaire to assess quality of life (SF-36). Results: The analysis of the results showed that the QEP of non-contaminated individuals was lower (0.64 + 0.04) than that of individuals who tested positive for the disease (0.73 + 0.02) (p = 0.0484), statistically significant difference, which shows that positive cases are perceived to be more stressed. In the analysis of SF-36, only the Functional Capacity domain showed statistically significant difference, and the volunteers who did not have the disease presented higher value (93.3 + 2.0) than contaminated individuals (73.0 + 3.6) (p < 0.0001), suggesting better quality of life. Conclusion: The study presents results that indicate the pandemic negatively impacted the health of the population, as participants diagnosed with COVID-19 had greater perceived stress and lower quality of life, compared to non-contaminated ones.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Henrique Villa e Vila, Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic

    Graduando em medicina, Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, Araras. 

  • Danilo Crege, São Leopoldo Mandic Araras

    Professor Doutor Orientador, Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic Araras. 

References

Guan W, Ni Z, Hu Y, Liang W, Ou C, He J, et al., for the China Medical Treatment Expert Group for Covid-19. Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. New Engl J Med. 2020; 382:1708-1720. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/nejmoa2002032

Organização Pan-Americana da Saúde (OPAS). Folha informativa sobre COVID [citado 20 jan. 2022]. Disponível em: https://www.paho.org/bra/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=6101:covid19&Itemid=875

Ventura DFL, Ribeiro H, Giulio GM, Jaime PC, Nunes J, Bógus CM, et al. Challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic: for a Brazilian research agenda in global health and sustainability. Cad Saúde Pública (Rio de Janeiro). 2020;36(4):e00040620. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0102-311x00040620

Wang C, Pan R, Wan X, Tan Y, Xu L, Ho CS, Ho RC. Immediate psychological responses and associated factors during the initial stage of the 2019 Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic among the general population in China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(5):1729. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051729

Schmitd B, Crepaldi MA, Bolze SM, Silva LN, Demenesh LM. Saúde mental e intervenções psicológicas diante da pandemia do novo coronavírus (COVID-19). Estud Psicol (Campinas). 2020;37:e200063. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0275202037e200063

Ornell F, Schuch JB, Sordi AO, Kessler FH. “Pandemic fear” and COVID-19: mental health burden and strategies. Braz. J Psychiatry (São Paulo). 2020;42(3):232-235. https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-4446-2020-0008

Yadav S, Rawal G. The current mental health status of Ebola survivors in Western Africa. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(10): LA01-LA02. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2015/15127.6559

Shigemura J, Ursano RJ, Morganstein JC, Kurosawa M, Benedek DM. Public responses to the novel 2019 coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in Japan: mental health consequences and target populations. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2020;74(4):281-282. https://doi.org/10.1111/pcn.12988.

Chaolin H, Yeming W, Xingwang L, Lili R, Jianping Z, Yi H, et al. Clinical features of patients contaminated with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020;395(10223):497-506. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5

Margis R, Picon P, Cosner AF, Silveira RO. Relação entre estressores, estresse e ansiedade. Rev Psiquiatr Rio Gd. Sul. 2003;25(supl. 1):65-74. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-81082003000400008.

Zuardi AW. Fisiologia do estresse e sua influência na saúde [citado jan. 2021] Disponível em: https://www.ceppsima.com.br/pdf/fisiologia_estresse.pdf

Sadir MA, Bignotto MM, Lepp ME. Stress e qualidade de vida: influência de algumas variáveis pessoais. Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto). 2010;20(45):73-81. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-863X2010000100010.

Singh S, Roy D, Sinha K, Parveen S, Sharma G, Joshi G. Impact of COVID-19 and lockdown on mental health of children and adolescents: a narrative review with recommendations. Psychiatry Res. 2020;293:113429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113429

Pearman A, Hughes ML, Smith EL, Neupert SD. Age differences in risk and resilience factors in COVID-19-related stress. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2021;76(2):e38-e44. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaa120

Mazza MG, De Lorenzo R, Conte C, Poletti S, Vai B, Bollettini I, et al., COVID-19 BioB Outpatient Clinic Study Group Francesco Benedetti. Anxiety and depression in COVID-19 survivors: Role of inflammatory and clinical predictors. Brain Behav Immun. 202;89:594-600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2020.07.037

Salari N, Hosseinian-Far A, Jalali R, Vaisi-Raygani A, Rasoulpoor S, Mohammadi M, Rasoulpoor S, et al. Prevalence of stress, anxiety, depression among the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Global Health. 2020;16(1):57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-020-00589-w

Pontes BC, Salomé GM. Booklet on the use of personal protective equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic: preventing facial skin injuries. Fisioter Mov. 2021;34:e34111. https://doi.org/10.1590/fm.2021.34111

Published

2022-11-29

Issue

Section

Artigos Originais/Originals Articles

How to Cite

Vila, H. V. e ., & Crege, D. . (2022). COVID-19 pandemic: stress level and quality of life in contaminated and non-contaminated cases. Revista De Medicina, 101(6), e-199108. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1679-9836.v101i6e-199108