The paradox of the theory: interpreting Niklas Luhmann

Authors

  • Hans-Georg Moeller Universidade de Macau

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-2070201528

Abstract

This paper discusses the role of the paradox in Niklas Luhmann's social theory from an "autological" hermeneutic perspective: An attempt at an "orthodox" interpretation of Luhmann's theory, including his theory of the paradox, will discover that the theory does not lend itself to an orthodox interpretation. Thus, while the paradox of Luhmann's theory can only be understood through an orthodox interpretation, the very foundations of such an orthodox hermeneutic approach are deconstructed by its own results. On the basis of an insight into this hermeneutic paradox, the foundational role of the paradox in Luhmann's theory can be appreciated. For Luhmann, the self-construction of society as a complex system of communication functions on the basis of Paradoxieentfaltung, or the unfolding of paradoxes, which, in turn is grounded on "the foundational paradox of observation" (die Grundparadoxie des Beobachtens). Thus, social construction operates not by eliminating paradoxes, but rather by making use of them.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Luhmann, Niklas. (1995), Social systems. Stanford, Stanford University Press.

______. (1984), Soziale Systeme. Frankfurt, Suhrkamp.

______. (1996a), Protest. Frankfurt, Suhrkamp.

______. (1996b), Die neuzeitlichen Wissenschaften und die Phänomenologie. Viena, Picus.

______. (1997), Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt, Suhrkamp.

______. (2012-2013) A Theory of Society. Stanford, Stanford University Press.

______. (2000a), Short cuts. Frankfurt, Zweitausendeins.

______. (2000b), The reality of the mass media. Stanford, Stanford University Press.

______. (1996), Die Realität der Massenmedien. Opladen, Westdeutscher.

______. (2000c), Art as a social system. Stanford, Stanford University Press.

______. (1995), Das Recht der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt, Suhrkamp.

______. (2004), Law as a social system. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

______. (1997), Die Kunst der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt, Suhrkamp.

Moeller, Hans-Georg. (2006), Luhmann explained: from souls to systems. Chicago, Open Court.

Winthrop-Young, Geoffrey. (2000), “Silicon sociology, or two kings on Hegel’s throne: Kittler, Luhmann, and the posthuman merger of German media theory”.

Yale Journal of Criticism, 13 (2): 391-420.

Published

2015-12-01

Issue

Section

Dossier - Systems Theory and Social Critique

How to Cite

Moeller, H.-G. (2015). The paradox of the theory: interpreting Niklas Luhmann . Tempo Social, 27(2), 167-179. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-2070201528