Taking the individual seriously: the relationship individual-society in the system theory

Authors

  • Giancarlo Corsi Universidade de Modena-Reggio Emilia. Departamento de Comunicação e Economia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-2070201529

Abstract

ABSTRACT One of the most original contributions of systems theory to contemporary sociology is the idea that individuals are not part of society, but that they belong to its environment. If we consider the individual as a body and a consciousness, then we cannot conceive society as a set of billions of bodies and consciousnesses. According to systems theory, society can only be conceived as communication. On the other side every individual is a system on its own, an autonomous, self-observing and self-reproducing consciousness. Taking individuals seriously means then to understand how individuals observe themselves and how they face the social dimension of their life - and this means, that every discourse on "colonization", emancipation, meaninglessness, etc., aiming to take the part of individuals, is not only theoretically questionable, but contradictory, representing only the societal, not the individual point of view. Analyzing the modern forms of social inclusion like the career, the paper argues that observing individual as such means starting from its paradox - being unique like everyone else.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Batkin, Leonid. (1992), L’idea di individualità nel Rinascimento italiano. Laterza, Roma-Bari.

Bourdieu, Pierre. (1973), “L’opinion publique n’existe pas”. Les Temps Modernes, 318:1292-1309.

Clark, Burton R. (1960): “The ‘cooling-out’ function in higher education”. The American Journal of Sociology, lxv: 569-576.

Corsi, Giancarlo. (1993a), “Die dunkle Seite der Karriere”. In: Baecker, Dirk (org.). Probleme der Form. Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp, pp. 252-265.

_____. (1993b), “Inclusione: la società osserva l’individuo”. Teoria Sociologica, I (1):279-301.

_____. (2000), “Protest and decision-making in a society of blame”. Democracy and Nature, vi (3): 361-374.

_____. (2014a), “Hypertrophie der Zukunft. Scheitern als Perspektive der Karriere“. In: John, René e Langhof, Antonia (orgs.). Scheitern: Ein Desiderat der Moderne? Wiesbaden, Springer, pp. 311-332.

_____. (2014b), “Die Ordnung der Zahlen und die Intrasparenz der Öffentlichkeit”. In: Cevolini, Alberto (org.), Die Ordnung des Kontingenten. Wiesbaden, vs, pp. 63-82.

De Giorgi, Raffaele & Luhmann, Niklas. (2000), Teoria della società. Milão, Franco Angeli.

Fishhoff, Baruch; Watson, Stephen R. & Hope, Chris. (1984), “Defining risk”. Policy Science, xvii: 123-139.

Goffman, Erving. (1952), “Cooling the mark out: some aspects of adaptation to failure”. Psychiatry, xv: 451-463.

_____. (1961), Asylums: essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. Doubleday/Nova York, Anchor Books.

_____. (1963), Stigma: notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, nj, Prentice Hall.

Günther, Gotthard. (1979), “Life as poly-contexturality”. In: _____. Beiträge zur Grundlegung einer operationsfähigen Dialektik. Hamburgo, Mainer, vol. 4, pp. 283-306.

Habermas, Jürgen. (1986), Teoria dell’agire comunicativo. Bolonha, Il Mulino, vol. 2 Hahn, Alois. (1982), “Zur Soziologie der Beichte und anderer Formen institutionalisierter Bekenntnisse: Selbstthematisierung und Zivilisationsprozeß”. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, xxxiv: 408-434.

Hearn, Jeff. (1977), “Toward a concept of non-career”. Sociological Review, xxv (2):273-288.

Luhmann, Niklas. (1980), Gesellschaftsstruktur und Semantik: Studien zur Wissenssoziologie der modernen Gesellschaft. Frankfurt, Suhrkamp, vol. 1.

_____. (1981), Gesellschaftsstruktur und Semantik: Studien zur Wissenssoziologie der modernen Gesellschaft. Frankfurt, Suhrkamp, vol. 2.

_____. (1983), “Anspruchsinflation im Krankheitssystem: Eine Stellungnahme aus gesellschaftstheoretischer Sicht”. In: Herder-Dorneich, Philipp & Schuller, Alexander (orgs.). Die Anspruchsspirale. Schicksal oder Systemdefekt? Stuttgart, Kohlhammer, pp. 28-49.

_____. (1984), Soziale Systeme: Grundriss einer allgemeinen Theorie. Frankfurt, Suhrkamp.

_____. (1985), “Die Autopoiesis des Bewußtseins”. In: Hahn, Alois & Kapp, Volker (orgs.).

Selbstthematisierung und Selbstzeugnis: Bekenntnis und Geständnis. Frankfurt, pp. 25-94.

_____. (1986a), Ökologische Kommunikation: Kann die moderne Gesellschaft sich auf ökologische Gefährdungen einstellen? Opladen, Westdeutscher.

_____. (1986b), “Codierung und Programmierung: Bildung und Selektion im Erziehungssystem”. In: Tenorth, Heinz-Elmar (org.). Allgemeine Bildung: Analysen zu ihrer Wirklichkeit, Versuche über ihre Zukunft. Munique, pp. 154-182.

_____. (1989), Gesellschaftsstruktur und Semantik. Frankfurt, Suhrkamp, vol. 3.

_____. (1997), Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt, Suhrkamp, vol. 1.

_____. (2000), “Statistische Depression”. In: _____. Short cuts. Frankfurt, Zweitausendeins, pp. 107-112.

_____. (2005), “Einführung”. In: _____. Einführung die Theorie der Gesellschaft. Heidelberg, Carl-Auer.

Maturana, Humberto. (1985), Erkennen: Die Organisation und Verkörperung von Wirklichkeit (Wissenschaftstheorie, Wissenschaft und Philosophie). Berlim, Springer.

Nisan, Mordecai. (1972), “Dimension of time in relation to choice behavior and achievement orientation”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, xxi (2): 175-182.

Parsons, Talcott. (1959), “The school class as a social system: some of its functions in American society”. Harvard Educational Review, 4 (xxi): 297-318 (reeditado em Talcott Parsons: social structure and personality. Londres/Nova York, The Free Press, 1964, pp. 129-154).

_____. (1971), The system of modern societies. Englewood Cliffs, nj, Prentice Hall.

_____. (1977), The evolution of societies. Englewood Cliffs, nj, Prentice Hall.

Parsons, Talcott & Shils, Edward A. (1951), Toward a general theory of action. Cambridge, ma, Harvard University Press.

Treanton, Jean-René. (1960), “Le concept de carrier”. Revue Française de Sociologie, 1: 73-80.

Weick, Karl. (1995), Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, ca, Sage.

Published

2015-12-01

Issue

Section

Dossier - Systems Theory and Social Critique

How to Cite

Corsi, G. (2015). Taking the individual seriously: the relationship individual-society in the system theory . Tempo Social, 27(2), 181-198. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-2070201529