Human rights violations, law and collective memory
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-20702007000200001Keywords:
Human Rights, Atrocities, War Crimes, Genocide, Tribunals, Collective MemoryAbstract
Institutional responses to gross violations of human rights and humanitarian law may affect future human rights records, partly by contributing to the collective memory of the dark chapters in a nation's history. This article begins with an exploration of various theoretical ideas concerning the impact of legal responses on collective memory and cultural trauma. It examines ways of empirically measuring the effects of law trials on collective memory, systematically analyzing the procedures adopted in recent studies into the collective memory of atrocities. Here it takes as examples the Vietnam and Balkan wars as reported in the New York Times and described in textbooks on the History of the United States. Some of the findings from these studies are explored, indicating the conditional and selective effects of criminal trials on collective memory. Finally, the article draws some conclusions for future research in Latin America and elsewhere.Downloads
References
ALEXANDER, Jeffrey C. (2004), “Toward a theory of cultural trauma”. In: ALEXANDER, Jeffrey et al. Cultural trauma and collective identity. Berkeley, University of California Press, pp. 1-30.
ALEXANDER, Jeffrey et al. (eds.). (2004), Cultural trauma and collective identity. Berkeley, University of California Press.
ARENDT, Hannah. (1963), Eichmann in Jerusalem: a report on the Banality of Evil. Nova York, Viking Press.
BORNEMAN, John. (1997), Settling accounts: violence, justice, and accountability in postsocialist Europe. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.
COHEN, Stanley. (2001), States of Denial: knowing about atrocities and suffering. Cambridge, UK, Polity Press.
COLEMAN, James S. (1990), Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
COSER, Lewis A. (1992), “Introduction: Maurice Halbwachs 1877-1945”. In: COSER, Lewis A. (ed., trad., introd.). Maurice Halbwachs on collective memory. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, pp. 1-34.
DURKHEIM, Émile. (1984), The division of labor in society. Trad. ingl. de W. D Halls. 1a edição 1893. Nova York, The Free Press.
DURKHEIM, Émile. (2001), The elementary forms of religious life. Trad. ingl. de Carol Cosman. 1a edição 1912. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
FELDMAN-SAVELSBERG, Pamela, NDONKO, Flavien & YANG Song. (2005), “Remembering ‘The Troubles’: reproductive insecurity and the management of memory in Cameroon”. Africa, 75: 10-29.
FINE, Gary A. (2001), Difficult reputations: collective memories of the Evil, inept, and controversial. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
GARLAND, David. (1990), Punishment in modern society: a study in social theory. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
GIESEN, Bernhard. (2004), “The trauma of perpetrators: the Holocaust as the traumatic reference of German national identity”. In: ALEXANDER, Jeffrey et al. Cultural trauma and collective identity. Berkeley, University of California Press, pp. 112-154.
GOLDSMITH, Jack & KRASNER, Stephen D. (2003), “The limits of idealism”. Daedalus, 132: 47-63.
GOLDSTEIN, Joseph, MARSHALL, Burke & SCHWARTZ, Jack. (1976), The My Lai massacre and its cover-up: beyond the reach of law? The Peers Commission Report with a supplement and an introductory essay on the limits of law. Nova York, The Free Press.
GSS News, número 19, jul. 2005.
HAGAN, John. (2003), Justice in the Balkans: prosecuting war crimes in the Hague Tribunal. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
HAGAN, John & LEVI, Ron. (2005), “Crimes of war and the force of law”. Social Forces, 83: 1499-1534.
HALBWACHS, Maurice. (1992), On collective memory. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
HERSH, Seymour M. (1970), My Lai 4. Nova York, Random House.
KELMAN, Herbert C. & HAMILTON, V. Lee. (2002), “The My Lai Massacre: crimes of obedience and sanctioned massacres”. In: ERMANN, M. David & LUNDMAN, Richard J. (eds.). Corporate and governmental deviance: problems of organizational behavior in contemporary society. Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 195-221.
KING, Ryan D. (2005), When law and society disagree: Group Threat, legacies of the past, and the organizational context of Group Threat. Tese de Ph.D. University of Minnesota.
LANDSMAN, Stephan. (2005), Crimes of the Holocaust: the law confronts hard cases. Filadélfia, University of Pennsylvania Press.
LOEWEN, James W. (1995), Lies My Teacher Told Me: everything your American history textbook got wrong. Nova York, Touchstone.
MARTIN, Andrew. (1993), Receptions of war: Vietnam in American culture. Londres, University of Oklahoma Press.
MEIERHENRICH, Jens. (2006), “A question of Guilt”. Ratio Juris, 19: 314-342.
MENTAL HEALTH ADVISORY TEAM (MHAT) IV – Operation Iraqi Freedom 05-07. (2006). Final Report of November 17, 2006. Office of the Surgeon, Multi-national Force-Iraq, and Office of the Surgeon General, United States Army Medical Command.
MINOW, Martha. (2002), Breaking the cycles of Hatred: memory, law, and repair. Introdução e comentários de N. L. Rosenblum. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.
NINO, Carlos Santiago. (1996), Radical evil on trial. New Haven, Yale University Press.
OLICK, Jeffrey K. (1999), “Genre memories and memory genres: a dialogue analysis of May 8, 1945 Commemorations in the Federal Republic of Germany”. American Sociological Review, 64: 381-402.
OLICK, Jeffrey K. (2005), In the house of the Hangman: agonies of German defeat, 1943-1949. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
OLICK, Jeffrey K. & LEVY, Daniel. (1997), “Collective memory and cultural constraint”. American Sociological Review, 62: 921-936.
OLIVER, Kendrick. (2006), The My Lai massacre in American history and memory. Manchester, Manchester University Press.
OSIEL, Mark J. (1997), Mass atrocities, collective memory, and the law. New Brunswick, NJ, Transaction Publishers.
SAVELSBERG, Joachim J. (2004), “Religion, historical contingencies, and cultures of punishment: the German case and beyond”. Law and Social Inquiry, 29: 373-401.
SAVELSBERG, Joachim J., FAUE, Courtney & CHIEN, Yu-Ju. (2007), “Media, law, and collective memory: the case of the ICTY and Slobodan Milosevic”. Trabalho apresentado no Annual Meetings of the American Sociological Association, New York City.
SAVELSBERG, Joachim J. & RAJAN, Rajiv Evan. (2007), “Law trials, competing narratives and textbooks: toward collective memory of the My Lai trial”. University of Minnesota (mimeo.).
SAVELSBERG, Joachim J. & KING, Ryan D. (2005), “Institutionalizing collective memories of hate: law and law enforcement in Germany and the United States”. American Journal of Sociology, 111: 579-616.
SAVELSBERG, Joachim J. & KING, Ryan D. (2007), “Law and collective memory”. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 3 (no prelo).
SCHOTT, Ben. (2007), “Who do you think we are?”. New York Times, 25 de fevereiro, Seção 4, p. 15.
SCHUMAN, Howard & SCOTT, Jacqueline. (1989), “Generations and collective memories”. American Sociological Review, 54: 359-381.
SCHWARTZ, Barry. (1982), “The social context of commemoration: a study in collective memory”. Social Forces, 61: 374-402.
SCHWARTZ, Barry & SCHUMAN, Howard. (2005), “History, commemoration, and belief: Abraham Lincoln in American memory, 1945-2001”. American Sociological Review, 70: 183-203.
SIKKINK, Kathryn & BOOTH WALLING, C. (2007), “The justice cascade and the impact of human rights trials on Latin America”. Journal of Peace Research (no prelo).
SMELSER, Neil J. (2004), “Psychological trauma and cultural trauma”. In: ALEXANDER, Jeffrey et al. Cultural trauma and collective identity. Berkeley, University of California Press, pp. 31-59.
WAGNER-PACIFICI, Robin & SCHWARTZ, Barry. (1991), “The Vietnam veterans’ memorial: commemorating a difficult past”. American Journal of Sociology, 97:376-342.
WEBER, Max. (1976), Economy and society. Berkeley, University of California Press.
WEIL, Frederick. (1987), “Cohorts, regimes, and the legitimization of democracy, West Germany since 1945”. American Sociological Review, 52: 308-324.
ZALAQUETT, Jose. (1995), “Confronting human rights violations by former governments: principles applicable and political constraints”. Transitional lustice: how emerging democracies reckon with former regimes. Vol. 1: General considerations. Washington, D.C., United States Institute of Justice.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 Tempo Social
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
