The communication between pediatrics professionals and the hospitalized child
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.19757Keywords:
Communication, Hospitalized child, Professional-pacient relationship, Child care, PediatricsAbstract
The research deals with difficulties in the communication between health professionals and pediatrics patients, under hospitalization conditions. Considering that an effective communication involves mutual recognition, the research focused both patients and professionals, in order to understand the communication between each other and the ways they interact. Given the problem stated, the methodology is qualitative and the method, the case study. The field research was developed in a public university hospital in the city of São Paulo. A comunicação entre os profissionais de pediatria e a criança hospitalizadaTwo children were chosen for study according to the following criteria: in school age and staying in the hospital over one week. A systematic tracking of these two children was made, through observation and the family members and professionals involved in the children's care and treatment were interviewed, covering most of the children interpersonal relations in the hospital. We observed that the communication was established preferably between professionals and the children's family members, but not necessarily with the children's participation, living then on a secondary level in the relationship.References
Bordin IAS, Corrêa MCMR. Ansiedade da criança hospitalizada: ausência ou dificuldade na relação equipe-paciente? Rev Paulista de Pediatria. 1990; 29:67-70.
Helman CG. 2ª ed. Cultura, saúde e doença. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas; 1994.
Tosta RM. A atividade lúdica da criança no contexto da internação hospitalar. Boletim Clínico da Faculdade de Psicologia da PUC-SP; 1997.
Sadala MLA, Antônio ALO. Interagindo com a criança hospitalizada: utilização de técnicas de medidas terapêuticas. Revista Latino Americana de Enfermagem. 1995;3(2):93-106.
Viegas D. Relação pediatra-paciente. Revista Sinopse de Pediatria. 2000;3.
Hofling CK et al. Enfermaria psiquiátrica. 2ª ed. México: Interamericana; 1970.
Winnicott DW. A criança e o seu mundo. 3ª ed. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar; 1975.
Ruesch J. Comunicación terapeutica. Buenos Aires: Paidós; 1964.
Mouth RG., Silva SLA. Repercussões psicológicas da hospitalização na criança e sua família. Pediatria Moderna 1984;19(8):387-91.
Becker H. Métodos de pesquisa em Ciências Sociais. São Paulo: Hucitec; 1994.
Da Matta R. O ofício do etnólogo, ou como ter“anthropological blues”. In: Nunes E, organizador. A aventura sociológica: objetividade, paixão, improviso e método de pesquisa social. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar; 1978. p. 23-35.
Foot-Whyte W. Treinando a observação participante. In: Guimarães AZ, organizadora. Desvendando máscaras sociais. 2ª ed. Rio de Janeiro: Francisco Alves; 1980. p.77-86.
Sarti CA. Porque usar técnicas etnográficas no mapeamento. In: Lescher AD, Sarti CA, Bedoian G, Adorno RCF, Silva SL. Cartografia de uma rede. reflexões sobre um mapeamento da circulação de crianças e adolescentes em situação de rua da cidade de São Paulo. São Paulo/Brasília: Projeto Quixote-UNIFESP/FSP-USP/Fundo das Nações Unidas para o Controle Internacional de Drogas-UNDCP/Ministério da Saude-Governo Federal; 1998. p.3-7.
Velho G. Observando o familiar. In: Nunes EO, organizador. A aventura sociológica: objetividade, paixão, improviso e método de pesquisa social. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar; 1978. p. 37-46.
Piaget J. A equilibração das estruturas cognitivas. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar; 1976.
Rappaport CR, Fiori WR, Davis C. Teorias do desenvolvimento: conceitos fundamentais. Vol. 1. São Paulo: EPU; 1981.
Pereira SR. (Re)Construindo o hospital: a ótica da criança portadora de doença renal crônica.[tese]. São Paulo (SP): Programa de Pós Graduação em Enfermagem da UNIFESP; 1999.
Víctora CG, Knauth DR, Hassen MNA. Pesquisa qualitativa em saúde. Porto Alegre: Tomo Editorial; 2000.
Santos MER. (organizadora) O impacto emocional da hospitalização da criança. J. Ped 1984;56(5):341-44.
Santos MER. A hospitalização da criança: a visão do familiar. J. Ped 1984; 56(6):391-94.
Trezza EMC, Trezza E. Prejuízos emocionais à criança hospitalizada. Pediatria. 1985;7:181-83.
Huizinga J. Homo ludens. 4ª ed. bras. São Paulo: Perspectiva; 1996 [1938].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL PUBLISHERS
Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:
- Follow this code, and encourage the editors they work with to follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Edi- tors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf)
- Ensure the editors and journals they work with are aware of what their membership of COPE provides and en- tails
- Provide reasonable practical support to editors so that they can follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf_)
Publishers should:
- Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
- Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
- Protect intellectual property and copyright
- Foster editorial independence
Publishers should work with journal editors to:
- Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:
– Editorial independence
– Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research
– Authorship
– Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards
– Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor
– Appeals and complaints
- Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
- Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
- Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
- Maintain the integrity of the academic record
- Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
- Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
- Publish content on a timely basis
