Deing feminine: a permission for being susceptible to the hiv/aids virus?

Authors

  • Dafne Suit Universidade Federal da Bahia; Programa de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia
  • Antonio Marcos Chaves Universidade Federal da Bahia; Programa de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.19760

Keywords:

HIV/AIDS, Gender, Woman, Individualism and Collectivism

Abstract

From a socio-cultural perspective, the HIV/AIDS epidemic course is nowadays characterized in Brazil as a broader context in which the social dimension is organized and inextricably links feminization, heterosexuality and poverty. Systematic analysis of socio-cultural contexts has been indicating that the pattern in which these elements are organized has an important role in the path infection has acquired among those people inserted in those contexts. Regarding women's infection, it has been observed that the female gender in Brazil finds itself vulnerable to a rising mortality rate. The findings show that the social pattern in which the feminine gender has been socially built turned to be a facilitator for women's vulnerability. Suggesting the use of prophylactics in stable relationships is an uncommon practice and women's power of negotiation for such seems to be inversely proportional to women's dependence on the male who is the head of the family. This text brings a series of reflections concerning the social construction of the feminine role and infection by HIV. Taking into consideration, as a theoretical standpoint, the Individualism/Collectivism model, it considers the possibility that women have a cultural profile that enables them to be more centered on the collective dimension, especially regarding the preservation of family community, which makes them be more vulnerable to the infection.

References

Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Boletim epidemiológico AIDS 1998; 12(1).

Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Boletim epidemiológico AIDS 2002;15(2).

Berer M. La mujer y el VIH/SIDA. London: Bath Press; 1993.

Alves RN, Kovács MJ, Stall RPV. Fatores psicossociais e a infecção por HIV em mulheres. Rev Saúde Pública. 2002;36(4):32-9.

Vermelho LL, Barbosa RHS, Nogueira SA. Mulheres com AIDS: desvendando histórias de risco. Cadernos de Saúde Pública. 1999; 15(2): 369-79.

Guimarães K. Nas raízes do silêncio: a representação cultural da sexualidade feminina e a prevenção do HIV/AIDS. In: Parker R, Galvão J, editores. Quebrando o silêncio: mulheres e AIDS no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Reluma Dumurá/ABIA/IMS-UERJ; 1996.

O’Leary S, Cheney B. A tripla ameaça – mulheres e AIDS: Dossiê Panos. Rio de Janeiro: ABIA; 1993.

Souza E, Baldwin JR, Rosa FH. A construção social dos papéis sexuais femininos. Psicologia Reflexão e Crítica 2000;13(3):485-96.

Costa EV da. The Brazilian empire: myths and histories. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1985.

Hahner JE. Emancipating the female sex: the struggle for women’s rights in Brazil, 1850-1940.Durhan: Duke University Press; 1990.

Burns M. A history of Brazil. New York: Columbia University Press; 1993.

Miller C. The function of middle-class extended family networks in Brazilian urban society. In: Margolis M, Carter W, editores. Brazil: anthropological perspectives. New York: Columbia University Press; 1979.

Arrazola ID, Rocha I. Mulher, natureza, cultura: apontamentos para um debate. In: Rabay G, editor. Mulheres e sociedade. João Pessoa: UFPB/Editora Universitária; 1996, p. 45-55.

Neuhouser K. Sources of women’s power and status among the urban poor in contemporary Brazil. Signs 1989; 14: 685-702.

Heilborn ML, editor. Vivência. História, sexualidade e imagens femininas. São Paulo: Brasiliense/Fundação Carlos Chagas/Fundação Ford, 1980.

Bruyn M. Women and AIDS in developing countries. Soc. Sci. Med 1992; 34(3): 249-62.

Brito N, Cruz EF. Fios da vida: tecendo o feminino em tempos de AIDS. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde;2000.

Oyserman D, Coon HM, Kemmelmeier M. Rethinking individualism and collectivism: evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin 2002; 128(1): 3-72.

Kagitçibasi Ç, Berry JW. Cross cultural psychology: current research and trends. Annual Review of Psychology. 1989; 40:493-531.

Hofstede G. Cultures ́s consequences: international differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills: Sage; 1984.

Gouveia VV, Clemente M. O individualismo-coletivismo no Brasil e na Espanha. Estudos de Psicologia 2000;5(2):317-346.

Gouveia VV, Andrade JM, Jesus GR, Meira M, Soares NF. Escala multifatorial de individualismo e coletivismo: elaboração e validação do construto. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa. 2002;18(2):203-12.

Triandis HC. Individualism and collectivism. Boulder: Westview; 1995.

Schwartz SH. Individualism-collectivism: Critique and proposed refinements. J Cross-Cultural Psychology. 1990; 21:139-57.

Kagistçibasi Ç. A critical appraisal of individualism and collectivism: toward a new formulation. In: Kim U, Triandis HC, Kagitçibasi C, Choi SC, Yong G, editores. Individualism and collectivism: theory, method and applications. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1994. p. 52-65.

Oyserman D, Swim JK. Stigma: an insider’s view. J Social Issues 2001; 57(1): 1-14.

Bastos FI, Szwarcwald CL. AIDS e pauperização: principais conceitos e evidências empíricas. Cadernos de Saúde Pública 2000; 16(Supl.1):65-76.

Parker R, Camargo Jr KR. Pobreza e HIV/AIDS: aspectos antropológicos e sociológicos. Cadernos de Saúde Pública 2000; 16 Supl: 89-102.

Ferreira MC, Assmar EML, Souto S de O. O individualismo e o coletivismo como indicadores de culturas nacionais: convergências e divergências teórico-metodológicas. Psicologia em Estudo. 2002;7(1):81-9.

Downloads

Published

2005-08-01

Issue

Vol. 15 No. 2 (2005)

Section

Current Comments

License

CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL  PUBLISHERS

 

Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:

 

Publishers should:

 

  • Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
  • Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
  • Protect intellectual property and copyright
  • Foster editorial independence

 

Publishers should work with journal editors to:

 

  • Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:

–         Editorial  independence

–         Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research

–         Authorship

–         Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards

–         Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor

–         Appeals and complaints

  • Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
  • Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
  • Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
  • Maintain the integrity of the academic record
  • Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
  • Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
  • Publish content on a timely basis