Parental educational practices, child gender and birth order: an update

Authors

  • Isabela T. A. Sampaio Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.19841

Keywords:

Parenting, Educational practices, Gender, Birth order

Abstract

Parental educational practices regard how parents monitor, control and socialize their children. This article aims to update the literature about this issue, considering especially two factors: child gender (boy or girl) and birth order (only child, first, middle and last born child). Brazilian and international articles were considered, the latter from 2001 onwards. In relation to parental educational practices and child gender, it was observed that parents seem to prefer children of the same sex as theirs (fathers prefer boys, and mothers prefer girls). The literature also shows that there are differences in the way boys and girls react to family stressors: boys usually externalize and girls internalize behaviors. The articles referring to birth order, on the other hand, discuss mainly how the family resources allocation works according to the birth order of each child. It was noted that firstborns, especially boys, receive the greatest part of parental investment. Literature, however, is fragile and contradictory in relation to both issues; thus, more research is needed, especially in Brazil.

References

Baumrind D. The influence of parenting style on adolescent competence and substance use. Journal of Early Adolescence 1991; 11(1): 56-95.

Gomide PIC. Inventário de Estilos Parentais(IEP), modelo teórico, manual de aplicação, apuração e interpretação. Petrópolis: Vozes; 2006.

Alvarenga P. Práticas educativas parentais como forma de prevenção de problemas de comportamento. In: Guilhardi HJ. Sobre comportamento e cognição. Santo André: ESETec; 2001. p. 52-57.

Sulloway FJ. Born to rebel: birth order, family dynamics, and creative lives. New York: Pantheon Books; 1996.

Bee H. A criança em desenvolvimento. 7a. ed. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 1996.

Roelofs J, Meesters C, ter Huurne M, BamelisL, Muris P. On the links between attachment style, parental rearing behaviors, and internalizing and externalizing problems innon-clinical children. Journal of Child andFamily Studies. 2006; 15(3): 319-32.

Braz FS, Salomão NMR. A fala dirigida a meninos e meninas: um estudo sobre o input materno e suas variações. Psicologia Reflexão e Crítica. 2002; 15(2): 333-4.

Alencar EMS. A criança na família e na sociedade. Petrópolis: Vozes; 1982.

Glória DMA. Relação entre escolaridade e diferenças constitutivas das fratrias, 2005.Paidéia 2005;15(30):31-42.

Daniels B, Featherstone B, Hooper B, Scourfield J. Why gender matters for every child matters. British Journal of Social Work. 2005; 35(8): 1343-55.

Biddulph S. Criando meninos. São Paulo: Fundamento; 2002.

Preuschoff G. Criando meninas. São Paulo: Fundamento; 2003.

Keller H, Zach U. Gender and birth order as determinants of parental behaviour. International Journal of Behavioral Development 2002; 20(2): 177-84.

Gomide PIC, Guimarães AM. Efeitos das práticas educativas sobre o comportamento anti-social em crianças e adolescentes. Relatório de pesquisa PIBIC/CNPq (não publicado) 2003. Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brasil.

Weber LND, Prado PM, Viezzer AP, Brandenburg OJ. Identificação de estilos parentais: o ponto de vista dos pais e dos filhos. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica 2004; 17(3): 323-31.

Voland E. Evolutionary ecology of human reproduction. Annual Review of Anthropology. 1998; 27: 347-74.

Oliveira EA, Frizzo GB, Marin AH. Atitudes maternas diferenciais para com meninos e meninas de quatro e cinco anos. Psicologia Reflexão e Crítica. 2000; 13(3): 363-71.

Ehrensaft MK, Wasserman GA, Verdelli L, Greenwald S, Miller LS, Davies M. Maternal antisocial behavior, parenting practices, and behavior problems in boys at risk for antisocial behavior. Journal of Child and Family Studies. 2003; 12(1): 27-40.

Veenstra R, Lindenberg S, Oldehinkel AJ, DeWinter AF, Ormel J. Temperament, environment, and antisocial behavior in a population sample of preadolescent boys and girls. International Journal of Behavior Development. 2006; 30(5): 32-42.

Guttmannova K. Development of externalizing and internalizing behavior problems during middle childhood: risk and protective factors. Dissertation Abstracts International 2000; 66,2-B. (UMI No. AA13166291).

Gaylord NK, Kitzmann KM, Lockwell RL. Child characteristics as moderators of the association between family stress and children’s internalizing, externalizing, and peer rejection. Journal of Child and Family Studies 2003; 12(2): 201-13.

Oldehinkel AJ, Veesntra R, Ormel J, de Winter AF, Verhulst FC. Temperament, parenting and depressive symptoms in a population sample of preadolescents, 2006. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 2006; 47(7): 684-95.

Hastings P. (2005). Links among gender, inhibition, and parental socialization in the development of prosocial behavior. Merrill-Palmer Quartely. 2005; 51(4): 467-93.

Sulloway F. Birth order, sibling competition, and human behavior. In: Davies P, Holcomb H. The evolution of minds: psychological and philosophical perspectives. Boston, MA: Kluwer; 2000.

Hertwig R, Davis JN, Sulloway FJ. Parental investment: how an equity motive can produce inequality. Psychological Bulletin. 2002;128(5):728-45.

La Rosa J. Ansiedade, sexo, nível sócio-econômico e ordem de nascimento. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica 1998; 11(1): 59-70.

Fuchs SC, Tavares MB, Fuchs FC, Diligenti F, Abreu JRP, Rohde LA. Características de comportamento do filho único vs filho primogênito e não-primogênito. Rev Bras Psiquiatria. 2004;26(1):17-23.

Shebloski B, Conger KJ, Widaman KF. Reciprocal links among differential parenting, perceived partiality, and self-worth a three-wave longitudinal study. Journal of Family Psychology. 2005; 19(4):633-42.

Laurent B, Sebastian R. Birth order and youth delinquent behaviour: testing the differential parental control hypothesis in a French representative sample. Psychology, Crime Law 2005; 11(1): 73-85.

Rodgers JL, Cleveland HH, van den Oord E, Rowe DC. Resolving the debate over birthorder, family size, and intelligence. American Psychologist. 2000; 55(6): 599-612.

Zajonc RB. The family dynamics of intellectual development, 2001. American Psychologist; 56(6/7): 490-6.

Michalski RL, Shackelford TK. Methodology, birth order, intelligence, and personality. American Psychologist. 2001; 56(6/7): 520-1.

Montandon C. As práticas educativas parentais e a experiência das crianças. Educação e Sociedade 2005; 26(91): 485-507.

Downloads

Published

2007-08-01

Issue

Vol. 17 No. 2 (2007)

Section

Current Comments

License

CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL  PUBLISHERS

 

Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:

 

Publishers should:

 

  • Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
  • Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
  • Protect intellectual property and copyright
  • Foster editorial independence

 

Publishers should work with journal editors to:

 

  • Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:

–         Editorial  independence

–         Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research

–         Authorship

–         Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards

–         Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor

–         Appeals and complaints

  • Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
  • Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
  • Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
  • Maintain the integrity of the academic record
  • Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
  • Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
  • Publish content on a timely basis