The adolescent and the hearing loss: the portraited family relations in the test of the drawing in colors of the family

Authors

  • Luciana Maria Biem Neuber Centro de Estudos Homo Sapiens
  • Tania Gracy Martins Do Valle Universidade Estadual Paulista
  • Maria Estela Guadagnucci Palamin Universidade de São Paulo; Hospital de Reabilitação de Anomalias Craniofaciais; Centro de Atendimento aos Distúrbios de Audição, Linguagem e Visão

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.19894

Keywords:

Adolescent, hearing loss, psychology, family relations

Abstract

Present research aimed to investigate the emotional components and the difficulties involved in family dynamics of hearing impaired adolescents, since family has to deal with biopsychosocial aspects of adolescence and deficiency. Eight adolescents, aged between twelve and eighteen years old, both sexes, and their parents took part in the study. Family Colored Drawing Test - FCDT the employed tool, has been submitted individually to the adolescents and their parents. Each participant drew his (her) family and asked to the tool questionnaire. Thus, based in systemic approach, familiar context could be visualized in the particularity of each involved member, as well as general view of family structure. Therefore, it was observed that hearing deficiency causes dysfunctions that are shown through interactional dimensions, such as communication, conflicts, affection and integration, reflecting upon parents fear and unsafety, and upon their children, repression and dependency.

References

Retondo MFNG. Manual Prático de Avaliação do HTP (casa-árvore-pessoa-família). São Paulo: Casa do Psicólogo; 2000.

Minuchin S. Famílias: funcionamento e tratamento. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas; 1982.

Nichols MP, Schwartz RC. Terapia Familiar. Conceitos e Métodos. In: Contexto histórico da terapia familiar. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 1998. p.15-74.

Cerveny CMO. A família como modelo. Desconstruindo a patologia. Campinas: Livro Pleno; 2000.

Dessen MA, Braz MP. A Ciência do Desenvolvimento Humano. Tendências atuais e perspectivas futuras. In: A família e suas inter-relações com o desenvolvimento humano. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2005. p.113-131.

Relvas AP. O ciclo vital da família: perspectiva sistêmica. Porto Alegre: Edições Afrontamento; 1996.

Carter B, Mcgoldrick M. As mudanças no ciclo de vida familiar. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas; 1995.

Vitiello N, Conceição ISC, Canella PRB, Cavalcanti RC. Adolescência hoje. São Paulo: Roca; 1988.

Aberastuy A, Knobel M. Adolescência normal. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas; 1992.

Vitiello N, Conceição ISC. Aceitação da vida sexual de filhas adolescentes solteiras: um estudo comparativo. Rev Bras Ginecologia Obstetrícia. 1988;10(7).

Jesus MCP, Temer VP, Silva MA. A educação sexual realizada na família e na escola: opinião de escolares adolescentes. Rev Bras Sexualidade Humana. 1997; 8(1):133.

Nascimento MJC, Romera MLC. Sexualidade, psiquismo e a educação sexual entre pais e filhos adolescentes. Rev Bras Sexualidade Humana. 1999; 10(2):237-250.

Tiba I. Puberdade e Adolescência: desenvolvimento biopsicossocial. São Paulo: Agora; 1986.

_____ Juventude e Drogas: Anjos Caídos. São Paulo: Integrare; 2007.

_____ Adolescentes: Quem Ama Educa! São Paulo: Integrare; 2007.

Zagury T. Direitos dos Pais. Construindo cidadãos em tempo de crise. Cidade: Record; 2004.

Souza EG. Surdez e significado social. São Paulo: Cortez;1982.

Silman S. Silverman CA. Auditory diagnosis: principles and applications, editors. San Diego: Singular; 1997.

Motti TFG. A rotina de um centro de referência em deficiência auditiva: perspectivas de pais e profissionais[dissertação]. São Carlos: Universidade Federal de São Carlos; 2000.

Férez-Carneiro TF. O papel da família na promoção da saúde mental. Psicologia Hospitalar. 1996; 12(12):4-9.

Valle TGM. Reciprocidade sócio-afetivada criança com fissura lábio-palatal e sua família [doutorado] São Paulo: Universidade de São Paulo; 2000.

Corman L. O teste do desenho da família. São Paulo: Mestre Jou; 1979.

Downloads

Published

2008-12-01

Issue

Vol. 18 No. 3 (2008)

Section

Original Research

License

CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL  PUBLISHERS

 

Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:

 

Publishers should:

 

  • Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
  • Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
  • Protect intellectual property and copyright
  • Foster editorial independence

 

Publishers should work with journal editors to:

 

  • Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:

–         Editorial  independence

–         Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research

–         Authorship

–         Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards

–         Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor

–         Appeals and complaints

  • Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
  • Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
  • Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
  • Maintain the integrity of the academic record
  • Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
  • Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
  • Publish content on a timely basis