A connecting device - report of experience of PAI-PJ/TJMG, a policy for the full attention to the insane lawbreaker in Belo Horizonte
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.19951Keywords:
security, clinical competence, public policyAbstract
This study attempts to show that solutions of sociability can only be achieved when the patient with mental disorders counts with the secretary of a complex and multifaceted program which is not built by a few hands, or in a short time. We must be aware of the solutions of the subject and its connections to the contributions of the various segment of the society, in promoting the expansion of ties of sociability of the insane offenders in the interstices and on the main roads of their relations of coexistence. The Program PAI-PJ, as a connecting device, demonstrates this possibility.References
Costa VA. A história dos pacientes judiciários no Instituto Raul Soares. Belo Horizonte, UNP, 2000.
Barros FO. Relato da experiência da pesquisa com os pacientes judiciários. Belo Horizonte: Mimeo, 1999.
Lacan, J. Da psicose paranóica em suas relações com a personalidade (1932). Rio de Janeiro: Forense-Universitaria, 1987.
Lacan J. Escritos. Rio de Janeiro : Jorge Zahar Editor. 1998
Lacan J. Outros Escritos. Rio de Janeiro : JZE.
Ministério da Saúde/Ministério da Justiça. Seminário Nacional para Reorientação dos Hospitais de Custódia e Tratamento Psiquiátrico : Relatório Final. Brasília: setembro de 2002.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL PUBLISHERS
Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:
- Follow this code, and encourage the editors they work with to follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Edi- tors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf)
- Ensure the editors and journals they work with are aware of what their membership of COPE provides and en- tails
- Provide reasonable practical support to editors so that they can follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf_)
Publishers should:
- Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
- Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
- Protect intellectual property and copyright
- Foster editorial independence
Publishers should work with journal editors to:
- Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:
– Editorial independence
– Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research
– Authorship
– Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards
– Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor
– Appeals and complaints
- Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
- Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
- Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
- Maintain the integrity of the academic record
- Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
- Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
- Publish content on a timely basis
