THE RECONSTRUCTION OF BODYAND TIME IN THE TRANSCULTURAL DIALOGUE

Authors

  • Ondina Pena Pereira

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.39783

Keywords:

dialogue, singuiarity, universaiity, cuiture, body, time.

Abstract

This article discusses lhe possibilities of establishing authentic cornmunication between cultures, respecting their diversity. The supposed promotion of lhe hurnan being to universality, predicted
in lhe globalization process, has presented itself, on the contrary, as a process of forced homogenization of ali cuitures, under market domination. Based on etimographies of non-modern peoples, I search here to conserve the singularity of the cultures, through an analysis of the differentiated relation that they establish with body and time, a difference that is also established in the relation with death. From this analysis, I reflect on the ethics of the transculturai dialogue, based on diversity.

Author Biography

  • Ondina Pena Pereira
    Mestre em Filosofia, pela UFMG, Doutora em Antropologia, pela UnB, Professora do Mestrado em Psicologia da Universidade Católica de Brasília.

References

Baudrillard J. De la séduction. L’horizonsacré des apparences. Paris, Galilée, 1979.

Baudrillard J. L‘échange symbolique et lamort. Paris, Gallimard, 1976.

Baudrillard J. Les strategies fatales. Paris, Grasset & Fasquelle, 1983.

Bensusan H, Pereira O. What virtue theory has to say about oppression? In: XX Aniversario de los Encuentros de Filósofos y Científicos Sociales Cubanos y Norteamericanos. Habana, Cuba, Universidad de la Habana, 2002.

Evans-Pritchard E. Os Nuer. (Trad. bras. Ana M. G. Coelho). São Paulo, Perspectiva, 1978.

Hegel GWF. La phénoménologie de l‘esprit. (Trad. Jean Hyppolite). Paris, Aubier, 1939.

Leenhardt M. Do Kamo: la personne et lemythe dans le monde mélanésien. Paris, Gallimard, 1947.

Merleau-Ponty M. O visível e o invisível. São Paulo, Perspectiva, 1971.

Tofler A. Futureshock. New York, AmereonLmta, 1970.

Virilio P. L’esthétique de la disparition. Paris, Galilée, 1989.

Downloads

Published

2003-12-19

Issue

Vol. 13 No. 2 (2003)

Section

Original/Atualização

License

CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL  PUBLISHERS

 

Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:

 

Publishers should:

 

  • Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
  • Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
  • Protect intellectual property and copyright
  • Foster editorial independence

 

Publishers should work with journal editors to:

 

  • Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:

–         Editorial  independence

–         Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research

–         Authorship

–         Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards

–         Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor

–         Appeals and complaints

  • Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
  • Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
  • Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
  • Maintain the integrity of the academic record
  • Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
  • Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
  • Publish content on a timely basis