Justice for Animals According to Plutarch
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2177-4218.v10i1p54-76Keywords:
Vegetarianism in antiquity; Animal justice; Human-animal relations; PlutarchAbstract
This paper is an attempt to describe in details Plutarch’s view on the idea of justice between animals and humans, on the basis of a representative selection of passages from his works. Most of the analyzed passages are from De sollertia animalium and De esu carnium. The criterion of selection was lexical and contextual, so passages containing words semantically related to the Greek terms for justice or law were particularly taken into account, as well as assages simply referring to the subject of justice for animals from the context. The conclusion is that Plutarch believed that justice between humans and animals is possible and should be applied, but being conscious of how difficult this postulate is to achieve, he was content with urging to limit the consumption of meat.
Downloads
References
Primary Sources
Aratus. Phaenomena. Callimachus. Hymns and Epigrams. Lycophron. Aratus. Translation by A.W. Mair & G.R. Mair, 1921. Available online: <http://www.theoi.com/Text/AratusPhaenomena.html>. Acess: 11 fev. 2019.
Aristotle. Ethica Nicomachea. Edited by J. Bywater. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1894. l
Aristotle Politica. Edited by W.D. Ross. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1957.
Chrysippus. De Anima Hominis. Stoicorum Veterum Fragmenta. Collegit Ioannes ab Arnim. Stutgardiae in Aedibus B. G. Teubneri, 1964, vol. 2.
Diogenes Laertios. Lives of Eminent Philosophers. Edited by R.D. Hicks. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1972.
Empedocles. Katharmoi. Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker. Griechisch und Deutsch von Hermann Diels. Berlin: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung, 1906.
Euripides. Alcestis. Cyclops. Alcestis. Medea. Edited and translated by David Kovacs. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press, 2001.
Euripides. Alcestis. Hippolytus. Children of Heracles. Hippolytus. Andromache. Hecuba.
Edited and translated by David Kovacs. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press, 1995.
Herodotus. Histories. Translation by A.D. Godley. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press/William Heinemann, 1960, vol. 1.
Hesiod. Works and Days. The Homeric Hymns and Homerica. Translation by Hugh G. Evelyn-White. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press/William Heinemann, 1959.
Plato. Leges. Platonis Opera. Recognovit Brevique Adnotatione Critica Instruxit Ioannes Burnet. Oxford: Oxford Classical Texts, 1907, vol. 5.
Plutarch. Marcus Cato. In: Lives. Translation by Bernadotte Perrin. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press/William Heinemann, 1912, vol. 2.
Plutarch. Marcus Cato. Moralia. Translation by Frank Cole Babbitt. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press/William Heinemann, 1928, vol. 2.
Plutarch. Marcus Cato. Moralia. Translation by W.C. Helmbold. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press/William Heinemann, 1939, vol. 6.
Plutarch. Marcus Cato. Moralia. Translation by Harold Cherniss & W.C. Helmbold. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press/William Heinemann, 1957, vol. 12.
Plutarch. Marcus Cato. Plutarchi Chaeronensis Moralia. Recognovit Gregorius N. Bernardakis. Lipsiae, 1891, vol. III.
Plutarch. Marcus Cato. Plutarchi Chaeronensis Moralia. Recognovit Gregorius N. Bernardakis. Lipsiae, 1892, vol. IV.
Plutarch. Marcus Cato. Plutarchi Chaeronensis Moralia. Recognovit Gregorius N. Bernardakis. Lipsiae, 1895, vol. VI.
Porphyry. On Abstinence from Killing Animals. Translated by Gillian Clark. London/New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2014
Secondary Sources
Balaudé, Jean-François. Parenté du vivant et végétarisme radical: Le «défi» d’Empédocle. In: Cassin, Barbara; Labarrière, Jean-Louis; Romeyer-Dherbey, Gilbert (eds) L’animal Dans l’Antiquité. Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin, 1997, p. 31-54.
Becchi, Francesco. Istinto e intelligenza negli scritti zoopsicologici di Plutarco. In: Bandini, Michele; Pericoli, Federico G. (eds) Scritti in Memoria di Dino Pieraccioni. Florence: Istituto Papirologico G. Vitelli, 1993, p. 59-83.
Becchi, Francesco. Irrazionalità e razionalità degli animali. Prometheus, vol. 26, 2000, p. 205-225.
Brink, Charles Oscar. Οἰκείωσις and Οἰκειότης: Theophrastus and Zeno on nature in moral theory. Phronesis, vol. 1, n. 2, 1956, p. 123-145.
Cornelli, Gabriele. In Search of Pythagoreanism: Pythagoreanism as an Historiographical Category. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter, 2013.
Cornelli, Gabriele; McKirahan, Richard; Macris, Constantinos (eds) On Pythagoreanism. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter, 2013.
Dierauer, Urs. Tier und Mensch im Denken der Antike: Studien zur Tierpsychologie, Anthropologie und Ethik. Amsterdam: B.R. Grüner, 1977.
Edwards, G. Fay. Irrational animals in Porphyry’s logical works. A problem for the consus interpretation of On Abstinence. Phronesis, vol. 59, 2014, p. 22-43.
Edwards, G. Fay. The purpose of Porphyry’s rational animals. A dialectical attack on the Stoics in On Abstinence From Animal Food. In: Sorabji, Richard (ed.) Aristotle Re-Intepreted. New Findings On Seven Hundred Years Of The Ancient Commentators. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2016, p. 263-290.
Guthrie, William Keith Chambers. A History of Greek Philosophy. Vol. 1, The Earlier Presocratics and the Pythagoreans. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1962.
Haussleiter, Johannes. Der Vegetarismus in der Antike. Berlin: Verlag von Alfred Töpelmann, 1935.
Hubert Jr, Martin. Plutarch’s De Sollertia Animalium 959 B-C: The discussion of the encomium of hunting. American Journal of Philology, vol. 100, n. 1, 1979, p. 99-106.
Krauss, Fritz. Die rhetorischen Schriften Plutarchs und ihre Stellung im Plutarchischen Schriftenkorpus. Nürnberg: Druck von J. L. Stich, 1912.
Lecky, William Edward Hartpole. History of European Morals: From Augustus to Charlemagne, Vol. 1. London: Longmans, Green, and Co., 1890.
Miszczyński, Damian. Wegetarianizm orfików i pitagorejczyków oraz jego możliwe przyczyny na podstawie wybranych źródeł literackich. MA Thesis in Classical Philology. Kraków: Institute of Classical Philology, Jagiellonian University, 2015.
Newmyer, Stephen T. Plutarch on justice toward animals: Ancient insights on a modern debate. Scholia: Studies in Classical Antiquity, vol. 1, n. 1, 1992, p. 38-54.
Newmyer, Stephen T. Just beasts? Plutarch and modern science on the sense of fair play in animals. The Classical Outlook, vol. 74, n. 3, 1997, p. 85-88.
Newmyer, Stephen T. Animals, Rights and Reason in Plutarch and Modern Ethics, London/New York: Routledge, 2006.
Newmyer, Stephen T. Animals in Greek and Roman Thought: A Sourcebook, London/New York: Routledge, 2011.
Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1999.
Roskam, Geert. Plutarch against Epicurus on affection for offspring: A reading of De amore prolis. In: Geert, Roskam; van der Stockt, Luc (eds) Virtues For The People: Aspects Of Plutarchan Ethics. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2011, p. 175-202.
Sorabji, Richard. Animal Minds & Human Morals: The Origins of the Western Debate, 1st Edition 1993. London: Duckworth, 1995.
Steiner, Gary. Plutarch on the question of justice for animals. Ploutarchos, n.s., vol. 7, 2010, p. 73-82.
Tsekourakis, Damianos. Pythagoreanism or Platonism and ancient medicine? The reasons for vegetarianism in Plutarch’s ‘Moralia’. In: Haase, Wolfgang (ed.) Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II.36.1. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter, 1987, p. 366-393.
West, Martin L. The East Face of Helicon: West Asiatic Elements in Greek Poetry and Myth, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.
Ziegler, Konrat. Plutarchos von Chaironeia. Stuttgart: Alfred Druckenmüller Verlag, 1964.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Responsibility for the content published by Mare Nostrum rests exclusively with the author(s) of such content.
The reproduction of the texts published by Mare Nostrum is licensed according to Creative Commons license Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC).
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).