Think up to teach well: instructional design for remote learning

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2176-7262.rmrp.2021.184766

Keywords:

e-learning, online learning, planning, educational inclusion, assessment, COVID-19

Abstract

The pandemic caused by the new coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) imposed a worldwide scenario of social isolation and suspension of face-to-face teaching activities at all levels of education. It has forced the emergency adoption of remote teaching strategies to maintain the continuity of the didactic activities, even though in a limited way. On the other hand, most teachers, at all levels of education, had barely or no knowledge and experience with remote teaching. Although the educational institutions offered support, to some degree or another, it was up to individual teachers to do most of theirselves training, prepare, and deliver their subjects. Also, many courses were migrated to the virtual learning environment without the proper adaptations, which may result in worse learning outcomes. Although there are different methodologies for planning and implementing e-learning, the ADDIE model is largely popular and relatively simple to implement, and for this reason, it was chosen for the development of this article. Thus, we present the steps of analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation of a remote course. Additionally, we include practical elements such as an indication of equipment, software, links, and suggestions to accomplish these steps.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Anamaria Siriani de Oliveira, Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto. Departamento de Ciências da Saúde

    Professora Associada do Departamento de Ciências da Saúde

  • Lúcia de Rezende Jayme, Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto. Escritório de Relações Internacionais e Centro de Desenvolvimento

    Docente

  • Fausto Almeida, Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto. Departamento de Bioquímica e Imunologia

    Professor Doutor do Departamento de Bioquímica e Imunologia

  • Fábio Carmona, Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto. Departamento de Puericultura e Pediatria

    Professor Associado do Departamento de Puericultura e Pediatria

References

Khalil MK, Elkhider IA. Applying learning theories and instructional design models for effective instruction. Adv Physiol Educ. 2016;40(2):147-56.

Santos LMA, Tarouco LMR. A Importância do estudo da teoria da carga cognitiva em uma educação tecnológica. Renote. 2007;5(1).

Gustafson KL, Branch RM. What is Instructional Design? In R. A. Reiser & J. A. Dempsey (Eds.). Trends and issues in instructional design and technology. 2002:16-25.

Dick W, Carey L, Carey JO. The systematic design of instruction. Boston: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon; 2005.

Patel SR, Margolies PJ, Covell NH, Lipscomb C, Dixon LB. Using Instructional Design, Analyze, Design, Develop, Implement, and Evaluate, to Develop e-Learning Modules to Disseminate Supported Employment for Community Behavioral Health Treatment Programs in New York State. Front Public Health. 2018;6:113.

Gava TBS, Nobre IAM, Sondermann DVC. O modelo ADDIE na construção colaborativa de disciplinas a distância. Informática na educação: teoria & prática. 2014;17(1).

Vogt MSL, Alves ED. Revisão teórica sobre a educação de adultos para uma aproximação com a andragogia. Educação (UFSM); educação v 30, n 2, jul/dez 2005. 2005.

Tobase L, Peres HHC, Almeida DM, Tomazini EAS, Ramos MB, Polastri TF. Instructional design in the development of an online course on Basic Life Support. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2018;51:e03288.

Gavarkovs AG, Blunt W, Petrella RJ. A protocol for designing online training to support the implementation of community-based interventions. Eval Program Plann. 2019;72:77-87.

Peterson C. Bringing ADDIE to Life: Instructional Design at Its Best. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia. 2003;12(3):227-41.

Paiva DCd, Jasbick DL. TORI, Romero. Educação sem distância: as tecnologias interativas na redução de distâncias em ensino e aprendizagem. Revista Inter Ação. 2017;42(1):233-7.

La Taille YJJMRd, Oliveira MKd, Pinto HDdS. Piaget, Vygotsky, Wallon: teorias psicogenéticas em discussão. São Paulo: Summus; 2000.

Chantal Duarte Silva P, Shitsuka R, Gomes Paschoal PA. Afetividade nas interações em AVA: um estudo sobre a interação na educação a distância. Revista Brasileira de Aprendizagem Aberta e a Distância. 2015;14.

Bates AW. Educar na era digital: design, ensino e aprendizagem. São Paulo 2017. 48 p.

Awaisu A, Khalifa S, Mottram D, Ahmed A, Stuart M. Instructional design and assessment of an elective course on the use of drugs in sport. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2018;10(8):1124-31.

Bardin L. Análise de conteúdo. São Paulo 2011. 229 p.

Lee-Jayaram JJ, Berg BW, Sy A, Hara KM. Emergent Themes for Instructional Design: Alpha and Beta Testing During a Faculty Development Course. Simul Healthc. 2019;14(1):43-50.

Battles JB. Improving patient safety by instructional systems design. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006;15 Suppl 1:i25-9.

Bollela VR, Castro M. Avaliação de programas educacionais nas profissões da saúde: conceitos básicos. Medicina (Ribeirão Preto). 2014;47(3):333-42.

Published

2021-08-20 — Updated on 2021-08-23

How to Cite

1.
Oliveira AS de, Jayme L de R, Almeida F, Carmona F. Think up to teach well: instructional design for remote learning. Medicina (Ribeirão Preto) [Internet]. 2021 Aug. 23 [cited 2024 Jun. 13];54(Supl 1):e-184766. Available from: https://www.periodicos.usp.br/rmrp/article/view/184766