The jurists and the right in Bourdieu: the conflictive historical construction of legal rationality

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/0103-2070.ts.2016.107933

Keywords:

Bourdieu, Sociology of law, Codification, Legal field, Habitus

Abstract

The aim of this article is to analyze the jurist as an agent of social transformation and law as the motor driving such transformation. The analysis presupposes a reconstruction of Bourdieu which could overcome the criticism that the author had a theory of social “determination” that did not allow the consideration of possibilities of social “transformation”, especially through law. The first query is how law can contribute to social emancipation, then how the jurist can become an agent of social emancipation and finally what kind of research in the sociology of law is inspired by Bourdieu. This should allow the reader to consider the specific form of the political struggle in which jurists can participate through law in what Bourdieu calls the historical construction of reason.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Soraya Nour Sckell, Universidade de São Paulo

    Doutora em direito pela Universidade de São Paulo, doutora em filosofia pelas Universidades de Nanterre e de Frankfurt am Main. Investigadora FCT junto ao Centro de Filosofia da Universidade de Lisboa. 

References

Biddulph, Sarah. (2007), Legal reform and administrative detention powers in China. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Bourdieu, Pierre. (1972), Esquisse d’une théorie de la pratique, précédé de “Trois études d’ethnologie kabyle”. Genève, Droz.

______. (1984), Questions de sociologie. Paris, Minuit.

______. (1986), “La force du droit: éléments pour une sociologie du champ juridique”. Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales, 1 (64): 3-19.

______. (1987), Choses dites, Paris, Minuit.

______. (1991), “Les juristes, gardiens de l’hypocrisie collective”. In: Chazel, François & Commaille, Jacques (orgs.). Normes juridiques et régulation sociale. Paris, lgdg, pp. 95-99.

______. (1994), Raisons pratiques: sur la théorie de l’action. Paris, Seuil.

______. (1997), Méditations pascaliennes, Paris, Seuil.

______. (2012), Sur l’État: Cours au Collège de France (1989-1992). Paris, Raison d’Agir/Seuil.

Chauviré, Christiane & Fontaine, Olivier. (2003), Le vocabulaire de Bourdieu. Paris, Ellipses.

Commaille, Jacques (org.). (2004). Collection Droit et Société, n. 56-57, pp. 11-71.

Conradin, Philip. (2008), “Das kodifzierte Recht in der Rechtssoziologie Pierre Bourdieus”.

In: Hotz, Sandra & Mathis, Klaus (orgs.). Recht, Moral und Faktizität. Festschrif für Walter Ott. Zurique, Dike, pp. 437-467.

Dezalay, Yves & Garth, Bryant. (1996), Dealing in virtue: international commercial arbitration and the construction of a transnational legal order. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.

Engelmann, Fabiano. (2007), “Tradition and diversifcation in the uses and defnition of law: a proposed analysis”. Brazilian Political Science Review, 1: 53-70.

García Villegas, Mauricio. (2004), “On Pierre Bourdieu’s legal thought”. Droit et Société, n. 56-57, pp. 54-71.

Garth, Bryant & Sterling, Joyce. (1998), “From legal realism to law and society: reshaping law for the last stages of the social activist state”. Law & Society Review, 2 (32): 409-472.

Hacker, Daphna. (2004), “A legal feld in action: beyond the debate on who acts under which shadow”. Trabalho apresentado no encontro anual da Te Law and Society Association, Chicago, Illinois, 27 maio.

Lazzeri, Christian. (2012), “Conficts of recognition and critical sociology”. In: Bankovski, Miriam & Le Goff, Alice (orgs.). Recognition theory and contemporary French moral and political Philosophy. Manchester, Manchester University Press, pp. 142-159. [Versão francesa: “Confits de reconnaissance et socioloige critique”. In: Bankovski, Miriam & Le Goff, Alice (orgs.).

Penser la reconnaissance: entre théorie critique et philosophie fançaise contemporaine. Paris, cnrs, pp. 53-71.]

Miguel, Luis Felipe. (2015), “Bourdieu e o ‘pessimismo da razão’”. Tempo Social, 1 (27): 197-216.

Nassehi, Armin & Nollmann, Gerd (orgs.). (2004), Bourdieu und Luhmann: ein Teorienvergleich. Frankfurt, Suhrkamp.

Nour, Soraya. (2009), “Bourdieus juridisches Feld: die juridische Dimension der sozialen Emanzipation”. In: Buckel, Sonja et al. (orgs.). Neue Teorien des Rechts, 2. Stuttgart, utb, pp. 179-199.

Ocqueteau, Frédéric & Soubiran-Paillet, Francine. (1996), “Champ juridique, juristes et règles de droit: une sociologie entre disqualifcation et paradoxe”. Droit et Société, 1 (32): 9-26.

Renault, Emmanuel. (2004), L’expérience de l’injustice: reconnaissance et clinique de l’injustice. Paris, La Découverte.

Van Krieken, Robert. (2006), “Law’s autonomy in action: anthropology and history in court”. Social & Legal Studies, 15 (4): 574-590.

Published

2016-03-18

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Sckell, S. N. (2016). The jurists and the right in Bourdieu: the conflictive historical construction of legal rationality. Tempo Social, 28(1), 157-178. https://doi.org/10.11606/0103-2070.ts.2016.107933