Risk: a new device for social arbitration

Authors

  • Myriam Mitjavila Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Departamento de Serviço Social

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-20702002000200007

Keywords:

risk, social arbitrage, new health practices

Abstract

In the last two decades, social sciences have been registering and analyzing the growing appearance of a new way to codify the dangers and threats that characterize social life in contemporary societies. This consists of the proliferation of discourses and technical/ political practices organized in function of risk. We can observe that there exists consensus in the sociological literature about the definition of risk as social construction and the complex relationships between risk and scientific - technical knowledge. This work especially discusses the socio - technical and institutional bases of risk as a device for arbitrage of social problems in such diverse levels as the selective provision of social services, determination of guilt and/or danger in criminal behavior, allowance of credits in the financial system, management of human resources in the labor area, and others.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AYRES, José Ricardo de Carvalho Mesquita. (1995) Epidemiologia e emancipação. São Paulo, Hucitec/ Rio de Janeiro, Abrasco.

BECK, Ulrich. (1992) Risk society. Towards a new modernity. London, Sage Publications.

BECK, Ulrich. (1997a) La reinvención de la política: hacia una teoría de la modernización reflexiva. In: Giddens & Lash. Modernización reflexiva: política, tradición y estética en el orden social moderno. Madrid, Alianza, p. 16-73.

BECK, Ulrich. (1997b) Réplicas y críticas. In: Giddens & Lash. Modernización reflexiva: política, tradición y estética en el orden social moderno. Madrid, Alianza, p. 209-219.

BERGER, Peter et alii. (1979) Un mundo sin hogar. Modernización y conciencia, Santander, Sal Terrae.

BERIAIN, Josetxo. (1990) Representaciones colectivas y proyecto de modernidad. Barcelona, Anthropos.

CASTEL, Robert. (1981) La gestion des risques. De l’antipsichiatrie a l’aprés-psychanalyse. Paris, Éditions du Minuit.

CASTEL, Robert. (1995) Les metamorphoses de la question social. Paris, Fayard.

CICOUREL, Aaron Victor. (1985) Raisonnement et diagnostic: le rôle du discours et de la comprénsion clinique en médecine. Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales, 60: 79-89.

DOUGLAS, Mary. (1990) Risk as forensic resource. Daedalus, 119(4): 11-16.

DOUGLAS, Mary. (1996) Cómo piensan las instituciones. Madrid, Alianza.

DOUGLAS, Mary & WILDAVSKY, Aaron (1982) Risk and culture. Oxford, Basil Blakwell.

ELIAS, Norbert. (1994) Conocimiento y poder. Madrid, La Piqueta.

FOUCAULT, Michael. (1987) Vigilar y castigar. Nacimiento de la prisión. México, Siglo XXI.

FOUCAULT, Michael. (1992) Poder-corpo. In: MACHADO, Roberto. (org.). Microfísica do poder. Rio de Janeiro, Graal, p.145-152.

GIDDENS, Anthony. (1991) As conseqüências da modernidade. São Paulo, Editora Universidade Estadual Paulista.

GIDDENS, Anthony. (1995) Modernidad e identidad del yo. El yo y la sociedad en la época contemporánea. Barcelona, Ediciones Península.

HARAWAY, Donna Jeanne. (1991) The biopolitics of postmodern bodies: constitutions of self in immune system discourse. In: Simians cyborgs and women. The reinvention of nature. New York, Routdledge.

LAPLANTINE, François. (1991) Antropologia da doença. São Paulo, Martins Fontes.

LASH, Scott & WYNNE, B. (1992) Introduction. In: BECK, Ulrich. Risk society. Towards a new modernity. London, Sage Publications.

LUHMANN, Niklas. (1992) Sociología del riesgo. Guadalajara, Universidad Iberoamericana / Universidad de Guadalajara.

LUPTON, Deborah. (1993) Risk as moral danger: the social and political functions of risk discourse in public health. International Journal of Health Services, 23: 425-435.

MARTIN, E. (1992) The end of the body? American Ethnologist, 19(1):121-140.

MITJAVILA, Myriam. (1999) O risco e as estratégias de medicalização do espaço social: medicina familiar no Uruguai (1985-1994). São Paulo. Tese (Doutorado). Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas da Universidade de São Paulo.

QUESADA, G. & CARRO, M. (1991) Enfoque sistémico en la evaluación de servicios materno infantiles. Atención Primaria de Salud, Montevideo, 12: 2-18.

RABINOW, Paul. (1991) Artificialidade e ilustração. Da sociobiologia à bio-sociabilidade. Novos Estudos, 31: 79-93.

ROSANVALLON, Pierre. (1995) La nueva cuestión social. Repensar el Estado providencia. Buenos Aires, Ediciones Manantial.

SANTOS, B.S. (1995) A construção multicultural da igualdade e da Diferença. Palestra proferida no VII Congresso Brasileiro de Sociologia. Universidade Federal de Rio de Janeiro.

TITMUSS, Richard Morris.(1962) Income distribution and social change. London, Allen – Unwin.

Published

2002-10-01

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Mitjavila, M. (2002). Risk: a new device for social arbitration . Tempo Social, 14(2), 129-145. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-20702002000200007